Ping_ii said:
Gears sucks more sorry :) |
You've obviously never played Gears. I actually once owned KZ2.
Ping_ii said:
Gears sucks more sorry :) |
You've obviously never played Gears. I actually once owned KZ2.
I'm gonna make a statement. Everyone is so focused on the word "exclusive" here that its to the point of ridiculousness. Yes exclusives are a must have but lets not act like all multiplats are garbage and time killers till the exclusives come out. MS will announce its exclusive lineup later this year and next year and it will be another decent year. If you guys remember right Halo:Reach footage wasn't even shown till November of 2009 and it was a damn teaser. Six months later and we are playing a beta and less than a year total later and the game is released. MS does exclusives different. Everyone is jumping on the "bash MS bandwagon" for a delay. How many times did GT5 get delayed? How about LBP2? I'm not gonna mention every game Sony has delayed but this might literally be one of the first exclusives MS has ever delayed. Its actually shocking to see a 360 game get delayed. That is one of the things I appreciate about MS. They don't announce games years in advance to only see them get delayed over and over while my hopes only get dashed every time.
Sony will most likely have more exclusives and that is fine but lets not act like MS only has Gears and that is it. With MS announcing Codename:Kingdoms at last years E3 we can almost guarantee that game coming next year. Forza 4 has already been shown in glimpses. There will be exclusives coming. The funny this is multiplats are huge this gen like never before. So while it is nice to have exclusives, multiplats sell consoles just as well. Lets just call it the Call of Duty effect.




tuscaniman said:
|
I've played both Gears, can you now just submit to the idea that some people like Killzone more?
...
Torillian said:
I've played both Gears, can you now just submit to the idea that some people like Killzone more? |
Yeah that is possible. But I'd be willing to bet if you had 1000 people play Gears and Killzone that more people would prefer Gears.
Edit: I'm not trying to start a Gears vs Killzone argument.
tuscaniman said:
|
oohhh yes I have.
I owned gears 1 for PC finished once.
I finished Gears 2 on my friends 3 times(every time we go system link on 360).
Ping_ii said:
oohhh yes I have. I owned gears 1 for PC finished once. I finished Gears 2 on my friends 3 times(every time we go system link on 360). |
Then you must admit Gears of War is amazing.
tuscaniman said:
|
but KZ2 is better IMO that why when you said KZ sucks that came to me like this:
if KZ2 sucks and I like KZ2 more than gears then that means GEARS sucks more GET IT? =)
Ping_ii said:
if KZ2 sucks and I like KZ2 more than gears then that means GEARS sucks more GET IT? =) |
I'm glad for you. But I've also noticed you are Sony bias. Maybe I'm 360 bias. I guess we'll never know which one is better by examining our opinions.
/looks at meta
tuscaniman said:
I'm glad for you. But I've also noticed you are Sony bias. Maybe I'm 360 bias. I guess we'll never know which one is better by examining our opinions. /looks at meta |
looks at META really? by 2 points more? WOW......
so if KZ3 outmeta halo reach(sitting @ 92) by just 1 point that means KZ3>halo reach no questions asked?
I don't think you'll use the meta argument if that happens tho Im almost certain you'll backtrack.
Torillian said:
I've played both Gears, can you now just submit to the idea that some people like Killzone more? |
Lemme see, so instead of condemning both of them and breaking up a pointless, tiresome debate, you enter the fray and take someone's side? Well done sir! *rolls eyes*