Mary, one of the leading scientists making the discoveries of soft tissue from multiple dinosaurs, including the t-rex soft tissue, rejects the notion of them biofilms.

Researchers Debate: Is It Preserved Dinosaur Tissue, or Bacterial Slime?

Schweitzer says her team considered the hypothesis that the material they found in the original thigh bone was a bacterial biofilm, and rejected the possibility. She says there’s no reported evidence that biofilms can produce branching, hollow tubes like those noted in her study [Science News].

I don't agree with Mary that the soft tissue is 68 million years old or anything close.  I don't think such things could be preserved for so long.  I believe in a young earth.

I watched 3 of the Evidence" dinosaurs and man co-existed vids you linked to until i'd had enough...

@the "Evidence": I must say that drawings and sculptures are hardly evidence of something being actually observed by someone and that they actually coexisted at one point. One huge possibilty is that these people (being humans and all) created thses things by imagination, much like the tales of greek gods...etc as well as the fact that ancient people used to make personify most things in their surrounding environment, like death as a person who collects souls, thunder being an angry god, mother earth, father time - - - not too different from what we do now in books, movies ..etc - - - the mediums may be different but it's still all the same. or am i to assume that you now believe that Cerberus , Centaurs and this thing once roamed the earth as well??

Another possibility is that they simply found fossils in their area and documented what they found, scientists find fossils all the time nowadays, is it crazy to assume people might have stumbled upon fossils a few hundred years ago as well?

I'm tired of all these threads were people basically mock the believe of God. Now I'm going to have to create a thread that will prove that God exist and that he created the universe and the earth that's in it as well as prove that the bible is true (And I'll use alot of historical facts to back up my argument as well). Don't expect it soon though (in about 2 weeks or so). Look forward to it everyone :)

You're free to believe what you want to believe. But I ask you to consider that the Ica Stones drawings had dinosaur skin features that matches recently discovered petrified dinosaur skin. How would they know what it looks like unless they saw it? Maybe they just got lucky, right?

I know you never called yourself a humanist on these forums but I imagined that you would imagine yourself to be a humanist if one would ask you IRL.

Your last paragraph is key. And yes most people do this (elevate their personal morals). There's an alternative conclusion to the one you drew though. Why is this impulse so strong within us, the fact that so many people hold their morals up to an absolute? Why is it so hard for us to tolerate different opinions on our core moral issues? I can't see the necessity to evolve such a strong moral sense so quickly.

And about different morals, actually when it comes to core morals we have the same morals. Why is the world evolving its common morals to the Human Rights that we agree upon universally, no matter if you're atheist or religious. Human Rights = absolute morals.

I don't need luck. All I need is the Lord's blessing. I'll say it right now, you WILL be a believer once the Holy Spirit is through with you.

Oh my, you sure are something! You seem like a sort of cartoon character.

I think you are wrong about this. There used to be an indigenous tribe in Africa or Australia (can't remember where exactly). In this tribe it was considered moral for one to pretend to befriend someone, and then kill them when they least expected. Deceit and murder were considered virtues within that tribe (and as you can guess they never went very far, as a society).

In another comment you said that cannibals were wrong due to absolute morals. That is not true. Their morals were wrong because they didn't allow their society to move foreward. For a society to thrive people have to live together and work together. Stealing is immoral because it destroys stability. So is murder and so on. Morals have to assure people's wellbeing, so that people can live together. Human rights aren't absolute morals, but they're elevated to that status by people, because they assure people's well being and create stability within society.

I've only watched the first part of the series of videos, and I find a lot of the sources questionable.  Marco Polo, for instance, was later found to have been one of the greatest liars in history.  Almost everything he wrote was proven false later on.  I'll keep watching, though.  No sense in not hearing the opposition's arguments.  I mean, it's possible that a few decendents of dinosaurs still walked among men, though this seems tragically to be poised as an argument agaisnt evolution which it fails so terribly at.