Microsoft: Sony cannot rely on their shooters.

Tease.
| themanwithnoname said: http://gamrfeed.vgchartz.com/story/82111/sony-xbox-360-is-reliant-on-shooters/ I figured now would be as good of a time as any to debate the perception of the 360 as a "shooterbox." Peter Dille didn't exactly say that, but it's directly implied with his comments about Microsoft. Anyway my take is that this is pretty ironic considering that the PS3 has more exclusive shooters and more shooters published by Sony than the 360 has by Microsoft. Taking a gander at the list: Sony: So that's 9 to 8 Sony or 9 to 5 Sony if you wanna discount the "console exclusives." What does everyone else think of Dille's comments? Is it coincidental that they were made the release of Halo Reach? |
You forgot Perfect Dark
| Squilliam said: Microsoft: Sony cannot rely on their shooters.
|
Good thing they don't HAVE to. :P

Joe_D_Hoe said:
|
I've explained this. Sony makes more of ALL genres. It's not a big deal if you have alot of shooters if you're well represented in EVERY GENRE. This argument is invalid.

| Squilliam said: Microsoft: Sony cannot rely on their shooters.
|
LOL thats a good thing!
Imagine 2 "shooterbox" on the market, that mean if you want something different you don't have a choice but the Wii. =.=
NYANKS said:
|
Of course not. Thats why they are third, it takes a lot of the pressure to succeed off them so they can pursue their own niche. 
Tease.
Ping_ii said:
Imagine 2 "shooterbox" on the market, that mean if you want something different you don't have a choice but the Wii. =.= |
Well there are two shooter boxes on the market.
PS3.
Xbox 360.
Sony doesn't have many games not being reliant heavily on a shooting mechanic of some sort. 
Tease.
| themanwithnoname said: http://gamrfeed.vgchartz.com/story/82111/sony-xbox-360-is-reliant-on-shooters/ I figured now would be as good of a time as any to debate the perception of the 360 as a "shooterbox." Peter Dille didn't exactly say that, but it's directly implied with his comments about Microsoft. Anyway my take is that this is pretty ironic considering that the PS3 has more exclusive shooters and more shooters published by Sony than the 360 has by Microsoft. Taking a gander at the list: Sony: So that's 9 to 8 Sony or 9 to 5 Sony if you wanna discount the "console exclusives." What does everyone else think of Dille's comments? Is it coincidental that they were made the release of Halo Reach? |
Haha, no offense but you left out games on both sides. How can you name Resistance for the PS3 & not name Perfect Dark: Zero?
I only looked up shooters for the Xbox 360 & I didn't get half way through their library because it just got tiring.
Prey, Perfect Dark Zero, Bulletwitch, Call of Duty 2, Metro 2033, Call to Juarez ( Not Bound in Blood), Chromehounds, Crackdown 1 & 2 (Considered an open world TPS), Darkest Days, Deathsmiles, & Dreamkiller.
You see how I just easily added 12 shooters to that list ( they are either exclusive or on both 360/PC).
Ping_ii said:
Imagine 2 "shooterbox" on the market, that mean if you want something different you don't have a choice but the Wii. =.= |
Well there are two shooter boxes on the market.
PS3.
Xbox 360.
Sony doesn't have many games not being reliant heavily on a shooting mechanic of some sort. 
Tease.