theonewhoisme said:
Michael-5 said:
theonewhoisme said:
So you have really bad eye sight do you? And They never said anything about better or worse only different ME2 could go either way, dragon age origins looks better on ps3 after all, and multiplats don't really matter much anyways I said impossible in any practical way, they would of had to downgrade the graphics and put it on over 4 disks probably have to downgrade the AI too, who knows what would of happens to the framerate, yes the kingdom hearts team is the one doing versus and like I already mentioned unlike all the 360 games that get ported over there is the possibility that it will be far too impractical to port in a way that will make it playable if they used alot of the ps3s potential, of course if they anticipated possibly porting it (like they did for FFXIV) then it shouldn't be a problem but I don't think they did
|
My friends have been trying to push me into Dragon Age, after you ban ends, tell me if it's good. I really love ME, and people tell me it's similar. Either way that game is best played on a PC, and I'll look into that graphics bit (PS3 - 360).
Man 3rd person to get banned debating me.... I'm like some bad luck charm for overly strong PS3 supporters.
Anyway good point about Versus, and I'm not saying your wrong, I just have a feeling it's going multiplatform, without a drop in graphics. End of debate.
|
I haven't really played ME much, but from what I know the dialog tree is similar but not identical, and some of the character upgrades but for the most part it's a very different game, ME is more shooter then anything dragon age is full rpg, but that said, if you like rpgs you'll like dragon age, and it seems like anyone saying anything bad about MS gets banned no matter how true it is, and about versus, unless they hold back the ps3 version it's impossible for that to happen, I mean FFXIII was a turn based rpg and it was quite a drastic drop in graphics, and if you are right, they wouldn't have made the game the best it can be, so already gamers lose
|
The differences between the PS3 and 360 graphically are not much. They just process differently. PS3 can multi-process better, but the 360 can handle textures and total polygon counts better. A well made game (like Resident Evil 5, or Batman: Arkham Asylum) will look almost identical on both consoles, and still push the bar graphically.
As for Dragon Age, I love RPG's, but not all types of RPG's. I though FFX and Fable 2 were terrible, but Golden Sun, Lost Odyssey, Fallout 3 and ME2 are among my favorites. I'm going to play it at my buddy's house one day and see what it's like, but from what I hear, it's best to get the game on PC. Best graphics, the controls aren't forced onto a controller, and I can zoom out in battle, no fixed close up camera.
As for people getting banned, I think a lot of people here are very critical of Microsoft. Nintendo never gets this much scrutiny, it's generally accepted as the dominant form of gaming. However PS3 and 360 fans are always at competition, and Sony has had a more successful past (meaning, more loyal followers, and wishful thinkers). So, it's just stupid debating. It's best to leave opinions debatable, but leave them at opinions. If someone like me beleives FFXIII Versus will go multiplatform, feel free to debate me, but don't insult me please. I say things for all consoles that anyone could argue, thats why it's just opinion. Based on knowledge, but I'm not professional analyst.
P.S. If ME3 is multiplatform (which it will likely be), it will also be a timed exclusive, and I want to finish this story asap. I can't wait a year. Also without your own decisions from the first game, it's just not as fun..