People thought Uncharted 2's multi-player was unneeded as well and it ended up working out for them. Multi-player doesn't automatically make the single player any worse and if it's done well (like in Uncharted) then it only add's to the overall package. The people mention reviews should just look at Gears 2, the online multi-player was an atrocity upon mankind and it still reviewed extremely well.

No they don't have. Stop using Bioware as a weapon to prove the Point.

Bioware was acquired by Ea later.They don't trust Deadspace that's why they are trying to do

Deadspace 2 with something similar to L4d in mind they don't have talent

bioware counts because they are an EA dev just like Naughty Dog is a Sony Dev. And Retro is a nintendo dev. Does naughty dog not count as a sony dev?

 I only listed examples... released when bioware was owned by EA
Plus I listed other examples. Such as the original Dead Space which was more original than Left for Dead was in the first place imo.
How was the original dead space good? If EA has no talented devs.

Even without including Bioware there's still
Dice, And Maxis, Visceral, and probably others.
With franchises of Battlefield. As well as The Sims.
Plus, Medal of Honor was made before Call of Duty ever was.

EA has many developing subsidaries and divisions... some are more talented than others. But they are EA devs, including bioware, and viscarel the makers of dead space.

No ME came before Ea acquired them (ME was published by M$) and dragon Age  was announced in 2004.

so you're saying bioware is going to be aweful from here on out?

And Mass Effect 2 (bioware's highest rated game) doesn't count where EA montreal helped bioware make that game?

http://uk.gamespot.com/news/6205477.html?tag=latestheadlines;title;4

plus you ignored all my other examples.

Ea helped because they are now part of Ea it's their duty to support them.These people are just small programmers,coder to help to speed the process of making the game so that product completes in time. They had nothing to do with story.

Bioware has already set up the base by creating awesome new IP called ME and Dragon Age.

Even if  Ea makes new IP they are ripping some big games released so far, has Ea made something like ME or Dragon age -----no.

Ea wanted to cash in the success of MW so they made BC.Earlier BF was PC exclusive and had more depth in gameplay BC is nothing but same consolize BF series which was made because MW was biggest success in 2007.

As for your deadspace statement:  you are right Deadspace is an amazing game.But it failed in sales that's why they are trying to copy Valve's formula in Deadspace 2.

Well I have the PC version of Battlefield 2.... So by EA seeing a chance and taking it to make money by competing with modern warfare, it competley discounts that battlefield 2 or 2142 was an original idea that an EA dev had, and that by releasing a consolized version of their battlefield series discounts DICE as a talented Dev?

And by releasing a short multiplayer. that = them copying left for dead? Even if the singleplayer is completely original and improved... (which you or I have no proof of knowing either way.)

Deadspace as a game was good and i am looking forward to deadspace 2 for Sp only.

I watched the Mp trailer and it's looking similar to L4d

But the Point still remains why  Ea always tries to copy(ripped) other games.

so pointless...

I would rather have a co-op horde mode rather than this.