By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
bad22 on 12 September 2010
Edit Thread
thelifatree said:
bad22 said:
thelifatree said:

 

bioware counts because they are an EA dev just like Naughty Dog is a Sony Dev. And Retro is a nintendo dev. Does naughty dog not count for sony?


 I only listed examples... released when bioware was owned by EA
Plus I listed other examples. Such as the original Dead Space which was more original than Left for Dead was in the first place imo. And Battlefield. As well as The Sims.


EA has many developing subsidaries and divisions... some are more talented than others. But they are EA devs, including bioware, and viscarel the makers of dead space.

No ME came before Ea acquired them (ME was published by M$) and dragon Age  was announced in 2004.

 


so you're saying bioware is going to be aweful from here on out?

And Mass Effect 2 (bioware's highest rated game) doesn't count where EA montreal helped bioware make that game?

http://uk.gamespot.com/news/6205477.html?tag=latestheadlines;title;4

plus you ignored all my other examples.


Ea helped because they are now part of Ea it's their duty to support them.These people are just small programmers,coder to help to speed the process of making the game so that product completes in time. They had nothing to do with story.

Bioware has already set up the base by creating awesome new IP called ME and Dragon Age.

Even if  Ea makes new IP they are ripping some big games released so far, has Ea made something like ME or Dragon age -----no.

Ea wanted to cash in the success of MW so they made BC.Earlier BF was PC exclusive and had more depth in gameplay BC is nothing but same consolize BF series which was made because MW was biggest success in 2007.

As for your deadspace statement:  you are right Deadspace is an amazing game.But it failed in sales that's why they are trying to copy Valve's formula in Deadspace 2.