By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - kinect can't capture fast movement?

scottie on 13 September 2010
theprof00 said:
JazzyJeez said:

 

From the demo's I've seen of dance central, apart from a very slight lag it seems to detect fast movement quite well, I can't see a problem with it detecting a normal person's punch and 30fps seems fine, I'm sure future fw updates will iron them kinks out.

That 'off topic' comment has got to win childish hissy fit of the day.

What is being shown on the screen of dance central is the computer video for you to follow, it is not actually tracking your movements as much as you think it is. Most likely it tracks specfic body parts when they are called for as input. Like, say the game tells you to raise your arm, the game has only been shallowly tracking your arm, but now that it's a vital part of the input, it puts all its power into tracking that movement.

By no means is it showing you on the screen or tracking your entire movement. I'm sure when it releases there will be all kinds of videos on youtube showing how little movement you can actually do to get a high score.


Really? I was hoping that Dance  Central would be treated by the internets in much the same way Wii Fit was http://www.youtube.com/verify_age?next_url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v31qxrXsxv0



Around the Network
Legend11 on 13 September 2010
dunno001 said:
A Bad Clown said:
RaY_Z said:
Jadedx said:

Wow, Leo-J trolls the 360 all the time and never gets banned, but two people call him out and get banned? I always thought the vgchartz staff were biased, but now I have proof.

You are soo sooo soooo extremely correct in many many many ways.

As far as I know 360 trolling isn't a ban but Playstation trolling is.

*sighs* Both are bannable. However, we are humans, not robots. We don't see every post made. If you see someone trolling, then report the post! The perception of PS trolling being bannable is probably because we have more Sony fans on the site, and thus, more people report those posts. This draws our attention to them, and we can take action.

As for things like this thread and leo-j's pattern of posting them, do I care for them? No. But they are properly sourced, and offer up fair discussion for debunking, like some have done here. Our job as moderators is to deal with rule violations, not stifle discussion. Both good and bad news comes out, and we will let both be discussed. We will act when people start making baseless accusations, and troll a system or its users, or outright flame a member for their thoughts. I'm not seeing that in leo-j's posts, and thus, I have no leg with which to act on.

I've given up reporting people in the Microsoft forum because I don't think that any of my reports have ever lead to anything, sometimes I wonder if some of them were actually read.

Here's the last thing I reported for example:

(In yet another Halo bashing thread, has any other game or series on VGChartz ever been bashed as much?)

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=116047&page=1#

Two of AbbathTheGrim's posts:

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3629392

"I just played it yesterday in my Uni's PC. Halo should have stayed in PC along with Microsoft."

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3629427

"I personally don't like Microsoft in the console market. I don't want them as competition for Sony and Nintendo. My two cents."

I mean does that really belong in a thread discussing a game?



jneul on 13 September 2010

i agree that some motions will be detected by kinect, however some of the faster movements may not be detected correctly, this is due to the 30fp limitation, sorry guys, i have seen dance central videos where yes it is tracking the whole body but a guy was dancing very badly to it and still managed to get a very good score, this leads me to think it is not tracking it as precisely as you all think

Just an opinion, but I have to get hands on with kinct to confirm my thoery of kinect being to slow for fast punches, so be nice ppl as this is just as bad as calling move a wii-copy right now,....



it's the future of handheld

PS VITA = LIFE

The official Vita thread http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=130023&page=1

oldschoolfool on 13 September 2010
dunno001 said:
A Bad Clown said:
RaY_Z said:
Jadedx said:

Wow, Leo-J trolls the 360 all the time and never gets banned, but two people call him out and get banned? I always thought the vgchartz staff were biased, but now I have proof.

You are soo sooo soooo extremely correct in many many many ways.

As far as I know 360 trolling isn't a ban but Playstation trolling is.

*sighs* Both are bannable. However, we are humans, not robots. We don't see every post made. If you see someone trolling, then report the post! The perception of PS trolling being bannable is probably because we have more Sony fans on the site, and thus, more people report those posts. This draws our attention to them, and we can take action.

As for things like this thread and leo-j's pattern of posting them, do I care for them? No. But they are properly sourced, and offer up fair discussion for debunking, like some have done here. Our job as moderators is to deal with rule violations, not stifle discussion. Both good and bad news comes out, and we will let both be discussed. We will act when people start making baseless accusations, and troll a system or its users, or outright flame a member for their thoughts. I'm not seeing that in leo-j's posts, and thus, I have no leg with which to act on.

So if I find and post a negative article about the playstation move,I won't get banned. As long as it's a legitimate article,right? lol



jneul on 13 September 2010
oldschoolfool said:
dunno001 said:
A Bad Clown said:
RaY_Z said:
Jadedx said:

Wow, Leo-J trolls the 360 all the time and never gets banned, but two people call him out and get banned? I always thought the vgchartz staff were biased, but now I have proof.

You are soo sooo soooo extremely correct in many many many ways.

As far as I know 360 trolling isn't a ban but Playstation trolling is.

*sighs* Both are bannable. However, we are humans, not robots. We don't see every post made. If you see someone trolling, then report the post! The perception of PS trolling being bannable is probably because we have more Sony fans on the site, and thus, more people report those posts. This draws our attention to them, and we can take action.

As for things like this thread and leo-j's pattern of posting them, do I care for them? No. But they are properly sourced, and offer up fair discussion for debunking, like some have done here. Our job as moderators is to deal with rule violations, not stifle discussion. Both good and bad news comes out, and we will let both be discussed. We will act when people start making baseless accusations, and troll a system or its users, or outright flame a member for their thoughts. I'm not seeing that in leo-j's posts, and thus, I have no leg with which to act on.

So if I find and post a negative article about the playstation move,I won't get banned. As long as it's a legitimate article,right? lol


if you do it will be a fight:lights out one But good luck to you as there really are not that many...



it's the future of handheld

PS VITA = LIFE

The official Vita thread http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=130023&page=1

Around the Network
oldschoolfool on 13 September 2010
oldschoolfool said:
dunno001 said:
A Bad Clown said:
RaY_Z said:
Jadedx said:

Wow, Leo-J trolls the 360 all the time and never gets banned, but two people call him out and get banned? I always thought the vgchartz staff were biased, but now I have proof.

You are soo sooo soooo extremely correct in many many many ways.

As far as I know 360 trolling isn't a ban but Playstation trolling is.

*sighs* Both are bannable. However, we are humans, not robots. We don't see every post made. If you see someone trolling, then report the post! The perception of PS trolling being bannable is probably because we have more Sony fans on the site, and thus, more people report those posts. This draws our attention to them, and we can take action.

As for things like this thread and leo-j's pattern of posting them, do I care for them? No. But they are properly sourced, and offer up fair discussion for debunking, like some have done here. Our job as moderators is to deal with rule violations, not stifle discussion. Both good and bad news comes out, and we will let both be discussed. We will act when people start making baseless accusations, and troll a system or its users, or outright flame a member for their thoughts. I'm not seeing that in leo-j's posts, and thus, I have no leg with which to act on.

So if I find and post a negative article about the playstation move,I won't get banned. As long as it's a legitimate article,right? lol





oldschoolfool on 13 September 2010
oldschoolfool said:
oldschoolfool said:
dunno001 said:
A Bad Clown said:
RaY_Z said:
Jadedx said:

Wow, Leo-J trolls the 360 all the time and never gets banned, but two people call him out and get banned? I always thought the vgchartz staff were biased, but now I have proof.

You are soo sooo soooo extremely correct in many many many ways.

As far as I know 360 trolling isn't a ban but Playstation trolling is.

*sighs* Both are bannable. However, we are humans, not robots. We don't see every post made. If you see someone trolling, then report the post! The perception of PS trolling being bannable is probably because we have more Sony fans on the site, and thus, more people report those posts. This draws our attention to them, and we can take action.

As for things like this thread and leo-j's pattern of posting them, do I care for them? No. But they are properly sourced, and offer up fair discussion for debunking, like some have done here. Our job as moderators is to deal with rule violations, not stifle discussion. Both good and bad news comes out, and we will let both be discussed. We will act when people start making baseless accusations, and troll a system or its users, or outright flame a member for their thoughts. I'm not seeing that in leo-j's posts, and thus, I have no leg with which to act on.

So if I find and post a negative article about the playstation move,I won't get banned. As long as it's a legitimate article,right? lol







jneul on 13 September 2010
oldschoolfool said:
oldschoolfool said:
oldschoolfool said:
dunno001 said:
A Bad Clown said:
RaY_Z said:
Jadedx said:

Wow, Leo-J trolls the 360 all the time and never gets banned, but two people call him out and get banned? I always thought the vgchartz staff were biased, but now I have proof.

You are soo sooo soooo extremely correct in many many many ways.

As far as I know 360 trolling isn't a ban but Playstation trolling is.

*sighs* Both are bannable. However, we are humans, not robots. We don't see every post made. If you see someone trolling, then report the post! The perception of PS trolling being bannable is probably because we have more Sony fans on the site, and thus, more people report those posts. This draws our attention to them, and we can take action.

As for things like this thread and leo-j's pattern of posting them, do I care for them? No. But they are properly sourced, and offer up fair discussion for debunking, like some have done here. Our job as moderators is to deal with rule violations, not stifle discussion. Both good and bad news comes out, and we will let both be discussed. We will act when people start making baseless accusations, and troll a system or its users, or outright flame a member for their thoughts. I'm not seeing that in leo-j's posts, and thus, I have no leg with which to act on.

So if I find and post a negative article about the playstation move,I won't get banned. As long as it's a legitimate article,right? lol

http://www.tqcast.com/2010/08/21/playstation-move-hates-bright-lights-major-flaw/-----what about this one. edited

oh yeah it's not a major flaw, also they carry on to ignore the warnings and move still works, just watch this to see how much it takes to throw move out, and yes it takes alot http://iwaggle.blogspot.com/2010/09/video-iwatch-playstation-move-vs-light.html, so that thread will last one second





it's the future of handheld

PS VITA = LIFE

The official Vita thread http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=130023&page=1

oldschoolfool on 13 September 2010
jneul said:
oldschoolfool said:
dunno001 said:
A Bad Clown said:
RaY_Z said:
Jadedx said:

Wow, Leo-J trolls the 360 all the time and never gets banned, but two people call him out and get banned? I always thought the vgchartz staff were biased, but now I have proof.

You are soo sooo soooo extremely correct in many many many ways.

As far as I know 360 trolling isn't a ban but Playstation trolling is.

*sighs* Both are bannable. However, we are humans, not robots. We don't see every post made. If you see someone trolling, then report the post! The perception of PS trolling being bannable is probably because we have more Sony fans on the site, and thus, more people report those posts. This draws our attention to them, and we can take action.

As for things like this thread and leo-j's pattern of posting them, do I care for them? No. But they are properly sourced, and offer up fair discussion for debunking, like some have done here. Our job as moderators is to deal with rule violations, not stifle discussion. Both good and bad news comes out, and we will let both be discussed. We will act when people start making baseless accusations, and troll a system or its users, or outright flame a member for their thoughts. I'm not seeing that in leo-j's posts, and thus, I have no leg with which to act on.

So if I find and post a negative article about the playstation move,I won't get banned. As long as it's a legitimate article,right? lol


if you do it will be a fight:lights out one But good luck to you as there really are not that many...

I found some,but it won't let me post the direct-link. It'll take me the site,but not the direct article. It's like it's blocking me from posting anything negative on the move. lol



oldschoolfool on 13 September 2010
oldschoolfool said:
oldschoolfool said:
dunno001 said:
A Bad Clown said:
RaY_Z said:
Jadedx said:

Wow, Leo-J trolls the 360 all the time and never gets banned, but two people call him out and get banned? I always thought the vgchartz staff were biased, but now I have proof.

You are soo sooo soooo extremely correct in many many many ways.

As far as I know 360 trolling isn't a ban but Playstation trolling is.

*sighs* Both are bannable. However, we are humans, not robots. We don't see every post made. If you see someone trolling, then report the post! The perception of PS trolling being bannable is probably because we have more Sony fans on the site, and thus, more people report those posts. This draws our attention to them, and we can take action.

As for things like this thread and leo-j's pattern of posting them, do I care for them? No. But they are properly sourced, and offer up fair discussion for debunking, like some have done here. Our job as moderators is to deal with rule violations, not stifle discussion. Both good and bad news comes out, and we will let both be discussed. We will act when people start making baseless accusations, and troll a system or its users, or outright flame a member for their thoughts. I'm not seeing that in leo-j's posts, and thus, I have no leg with which to act on.

So if I find and post a negative article about the playstation move,I won't get banned. As long as it's a legitimate article,right? lol



http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2787368/5_reasons_youll_hate_the_playstation_pg2.html?cat=19---- what about this one. Is this one banable. lol