LordTheNightKnight said:
|
OMG... I don't think trying to explain this to you is worth it. (walks away)
Hackers are poor nerds who don't wash.
Jordahn said:
|
How would that be a hassle? If there was a point in the comment that let you to mention magazines, it should be easy to explain. Unless you don't have one, and this is a cop-out to try to avoid admitting that.
A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.
Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs
That's how I've always seen those "Mama" games :)
LordTheNightKnight said:
|
Fine...
I hope you understand that most games featured on magazine covers are potenially big titles with a fair amount of ridden hype. They are on the cover to attract the attention of the reader/potential reader of their particular target audience. So maybe Baby Sitting Mama should grace the covers of gaming print publications because it's potentially on par with games such as COD or Starcraft but with a different target audience. That was the sarcasm because it might not be "a bad game" because we "were not the target demographic." So maybe Baby Sitting Mama should grace these covers of gaming print publications that normally do not cater to "young children -- especially girls -- age 4-8." And even if it becomes a great game along the lines of COD or Starcraft, I doubt hardly anyone here will really care as they probably also wouldn't care to see it on magazine covers. And to claim someone is copping-out is a cop-out in and of itself in an attempt to gloss over one's lack of understanding. Happy...?
Hackers are poor nerds who don't wash.
ahahahahaha, good joke game se.......
what what are you saying? it's not a joke?
ok..............
Well.
I was wrong.
I guess there still are a lot of high-quality hardcore 3rd party games coming to the Wii...
Jordahn said:
I hope you understand that most games featured on magazine covers are potenially big titles with a fair amount of ridden hype. They are on the cover to attract the attention of the reader/potential reader of their particular target audience. So maybe Baby Sitting Mama should grace the covers of gaming print publications because it's potentially on par with games such as COD or Starcraft but with a different target audience. That was the sarcasm because it might not be "a bad game" because we "were not the target demographic." So maybe Baby Sitting Mama should grace these covers of gaming print publications that normally do not cater to "young children -- especially girls -- age 4-8." And even if it becomes a great game along the lines of COD or Starcraft, I doubt hardly anyone here will really care as they probably also wouldn't care to see it on magazine covers. And to claim someone is copping-out is a cop-out in and of itself in an attempt to gloss over one's lack of understanding. Happy...? |
Actually, it should be on more than just gaming magazines, since that's the point of the expanded audience, and of games not made for the enthusiast gaming audience.
A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.
Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs
This thread illustrates two things I hate with a fiery passion:
Thread titles that are continued in the OP
Quotes that are longer than 4 fucking boxes
Kimi wa ne tashika ni ano toki watashi no soba ni ita
Itsudatte itsudatte itsudatte
Sugu yoko de waratteita
Nakushitemo torimodosu kimi wo
I will never leave you
| bmmb1 said: Regarding BabySitting Mama, you're all missing the point, it's actually a hardcore game, it's all about this hot mama who is babysitting all alone in this huge mansion when a serial killer enters the house, and the ensuing epic fight... Funny thing is that (according to the list I saw in Nintendo Everything) Square Enix have Black Ops in their booth as well - but no mention of the Wii version. |
BAH!!! You just reminded me there was a halloween video game... which was terrible, just the like the majority of movie based games...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDK3TZWCWpY
| dtewi said: This thread illustrates two things I hate with a fiery passion: Thread titles that are continued in the OP Quotes that are longer than 4 fucking boxes |
1
The title should be descriptive or at the very least, misleading.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
