Just gonna comment about a couple of things in the article:
Microsoft, despite inventing the smart phone business years ago, has never had any vision beyond putting some form of Windows on a phone platform with no regard to the form factor or user needs. To me this attitude continues with Phone 7 for no other reason than the moniker Phone 7.
Once one takes a look at the OS, one would immediately see that this is definitely not Windows on a smart phone. And it is definitely designed for mobile needs.
I cannot see Microsoft pulling this off even if Phone 7 is a remarkable product, which I doubt. The company shows no indication as to what the "app" model is all about or it would have been buying and seeding app developers the way Google Inc. /quotes/comstock/15*!goog/quotes/nls/goog (GOOG 458.83, 7.85, 1.74%) did early on.
The app model for WP7 is to have a marketplace that developers can sell their applications. It will not be quite as stringent as Apple's approval process, but there will be more control than Google's. They are providing very good development tools, very good design guides, and (as is quite well known)they are also providing monetary incentives to develop for their platform. Their marketplace also has supports applications to have trials, so no "Lite" bullshit is needed here. The tools have been downloaded over 300,000 times, and MS development tools are exceptional. Not sure what Mr. Dvorak is talking about here.
Information on MS using cash as an incentive to develop apps:
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-07-14/microsoft-pays-mobile-app-developers-to-catch-apple.html
For WP7 application certification information:
http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9730558
Resource for WP7 development(includes code samples, keynote and development sessions, tutorials, guides, documentation, etc):
http://developer.windowsphone.com/windows-phone-7/
About now in any column I should relent and talk about the possibility that Microsoft can pull this off. But the more I think of it the more I realize that Apple has changed so many elements of the game so uniquely that Microsoft cannot possibly spot the subtleties. There are too many.
I am curious as to what elements Apple has changed. He neglects to mention any of them.
Basically, an article full of generalizations and what appears to be little actual information about WP7 other than an advertising budget and an assumption that the marketplace will be devoid of anything useful, regardless of the fact that the most used/popular apps on competing platforms will definitely be getting ports.
This is almost as bad as that InfoWorld article that WP7 haters latched onto that was full of incredibly misinformed information and based completely off a single demonstration with no hands on time with the device.