By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - WOW. Bulletstorm New gameplay.

tuscaniman on 19 August 2010
puffy said:
selnor said:
CGI-Quality said:

I've seen exclusive games out already that look better, but this does look good. It's just too bad the game itself isn't pulling me in.


Really? I mean really?

I think this is quite a step up to any exiting console game. Same with Rage and Crysis 2. The scale and lack of framerate drop when that HUGE monster came out was unmatched.

Seriously I have seen 3rd party devs this year shine in tech alot more than first party devs. 

Top of my technical achievement food chain right now from all the games Ive seen are

Rage

Followed by 

Crysis2/Bulletstorm

Possibly then followed by

LOS/GT5/Reach.

Then the rest.


So you haven't played God of War 3 then? Also, in what universe does Reach approach the technical achievements of Gran Turismo 5?

The game is looking pretty cool though and yes the graphics are top notch. 


You aren't being serious about this are you? Cars are one of the easiest things in the world to render.



Around the Network
Solid_Snake4RD on 19 August 2010
kowenicki said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
kowenicki said:
puffy said:
selnor said:
CGI-Quality said:

I've seen exclusive games out already that look better, but this does look good. It's just too bad the game itself isn't pulling me in.


Really? I mean really?

I think this is quite a step up to any exiting console game. Same with Rage and Crysis 2. The scale and lack of framerate drop when that HUGE monster came out was unmatched.

Seriously I have seen 3rd party devs this year shine in tech alot more than first party devs. 

Top of my technical achievement food chain right now from all the games Ive seen are

Rage

Followed by 

Crysis2/Bulletstorm

Possibly then followed by

LOS/GT5/Reach.

Then the rest.


So you haven't played God of War 3 then? Also, in what universe does Reach approach the technical achievements of Gran Turismo 5?

The game is looking pretty cool though and yes the graphics are top notch. 


you cant compare a driving game to a fps... its a silly comparison.


sure but even comparing HALO reach with the biggesdt and not mentionin KILLZONE 3 and older games ME2,UC2,GOW3 is silly

so before making a reply to puffy you should make the "silly" reply to selnor


I already replied to selnor and watered down what he said by merely pointing out that at the very least what these recent games show us is that the 360 wasnt maxed out when sony fans told us it was 2 years ago.

By the way... whats ME2?  Mass Effect2?  Halo Reach is a LOT better looking than ME2, even accounting for the MUCH larger scale of Reach compared to ME2.  (I bet ME2 wouldnt have been in that list a few days ago lol.)

 

you just replied to him about the maxed out thing but not the main point that he goes over and over again

about ME2 and REACH,i am talking about the games atm

and REACH "looking better doesn't do anything",we will see at release and even if its  better ME2 was a good looking game and it need a mention

"I bet ME2 wouldnt have been in that list a few days ago"

sure.........hehe



tuscaniman on 19 August 2010
GodOfWar_3ever said:

I like it how selnor ignored KZ3, which is pretty much guaranteed to have HUGE maps in multiplayer.

But Bulletstorm does look awesome.....not a surprise really since Epic are involved.

Edit : Oh and inFAMOUS 2 looks absolutely gorgeous for a sandbox game


You realize Reach is a sandbox game as well don't you?



tuscaniman on 19 August 2010
Solid_Snake4RD said:
kowenicki said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
kowenicki said:
puffy said:
selnor said:
CGI-Quality said:

I've seen exclusive games out already that look better, but this does look good. It's just too bad the game itself isn't pulling me in.


Really? I mean really?

I think this is quite a step up to any exiting console game. Same with Rage and Crysis 2. The scale and lack of framerate drop when that HUGE monster came out was unmatched.

Seriously I have seen 3rd party devs this year shine in tech alot more than first party devs. 

Top of my technical achievement food chain right now from all the games Ive seen are

Rage

Followed by 

Crysis2/Bulletstorm

Possibly then followed by

LOS/GT5/Reach.

Then the rest.


So you haven't played God of War 3 then? Also, in what universe does Reach approach the technical achievements of Gran Turismo 5?

The game is looking pretty cool though and yes the graphics are top notch. 


you cant compare a driving game to a fps... its a silly comparison.


sure but even comparing HALO reach with the biggesdt and not mentionin KILLZONE 3 and older games ME2,UC2,GOW3 is silly

so before making a reply to puffy you should make the "silly" reply to selnor


I already replied to selnor and watered down what he said by merely pointing out that at the very least what these recent games show us is that the 360 wasnt maxed out when sony fans told us it was 2 years ago.

By the way... whats ME2?  Mass Effect2?  Halo Reach is a LOT better looking than ME2, even accounting for the MUCH larger scale of Reach compared to ME2.  (I bet ME2 wouldnt have been in that list a few days ago lol.)

 

you just replied to him about the maxed out thing but not the main point that he goes over and over again

about ME2 and REACH,i am talking about the games atm

and REACH "looking better doesn't do anything",we will see at release and even if its  better ME2 was a good looking game and it need a mention

"I bet ME2 wouldnt have been in that list a few days ago"

sure.........hehe


I don't know if you have played ME2 or not but I own it and the character models are top notch. Probably some of the best I've ever seen. But environmentally Reach is better and overall Reach is a better looking game. I played the Reach beta so I'm comparing it to ME2 btw. I'm sure the final product will look even better.



Solid_Snake4RD on 19 August 2010
tuscaniman said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
kowenicki said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
kowenicki said:
puffy said:
selnor said:
CGI-Quality said:

I've seen exclusive games out already that look better, but this does look good. It's just too bad the game itself isn't pulling me in.


Really? I mean really?

I think this is quite a step up to any exiting console game. Same with Rage and Crysis 2. The scale and lack of framerate drop when that HUGE monster came out was unmatched.

Seriously I have seen 3rd party devs this year shine in tech alot more than first party devs. 

Top of my technical achievement food chain right now from all the games Ive seen are

Rage

Followed by 

Crysis2/Bulletstorm

Possibly then followed by

LOS/GT5/Reach.

Then the rest.


So you haven't played God of War 3 then? Also, in what universe does Reach approach the technical achievements of Gran Turismo 5?

The game is looking pretty cool though and yes the graphics are top notch. 


you cant compare a driving game to a fps... its a silly comparison.


sure but even comparing HALO reach with the biggesdt and not mentionin KILLZONE 3 and older games ME2,UC2,GOW3 is silly

so before making a reply to puffy you should make the "silly" reply to selnor


I already replied to selnor and watered down what he said by merely pointing out that at the very least what these recent games show us is that the 360 wasnt maxed out when sony fans told us it was 2 years ago.

By the way... whats ME2?  Mass Effect2?  Halo Reach is a LOT better looking than ME2, even accounting for the MUCH larger scale of Reach compared to ME2.  (I bet ME2 wouldnt have been in that list a few days ago lol.)

 

you just replied to him about the maxed out thing but not the main point that he goes over and over again

about ME2 and REACH,i am talking about the games atm

and REACH "looking better doesn't do anything",we will see at release and even if its  better ME2 was a good looking game and it need a mention

"I bet ME2 wouldnt have been in that list a few days ago"

sure.........hehe


I don't know if you have played ME2 or not but I own it and the character models are top notch. Probably some of the best I've ever seen. But environmentally Reach is better and overall Reach is a better looking game. I played the Reach beta so I'm comparing it to ME2 btw. I'm sure the final product will look even better.

yes i have played ME2 and that why i was recommending it as one of the good ones

abt REACH,we don't know shit about it till next month

i'm not saying that REACH won't be good but just saying all those will be the best out there and then not even mentioning the biggest current games and some of the biggest upcoming is what selnor always does



Around the Network
Solid_Snake4RD on 19 August 2010
kowenicki said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
kowenicki said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
kowenicki said:
puffy said:
selnor said:
CGI-Quality said:

I've seen exclusive games out already that look better, but this does look good. It's just too bad the game itself isn't pulling me in.


Really? I mean really?

I think this is quite a step up to any exiting console game. Same with Rage and Crysis 2. The scale and lack of framerate drop when that HUGE monster came out was unmatched.

Seriously I have seen 3rd party devs this year shine in tech alot more than first party devs. 

Top of my technical achievement food chain right now from all the games Ive seen are

Rage

Followed by 

Crysis2/Bulletstorm

Possibly then followed by

LOS/GT5/Reach.

Then the rest.


So you haven't played God of War 3 then? Also, in what universe does Reach approach the technical achievements of Gran Turismo 5?

The game is looking pretty cool though and yes the graphics are top notch. 


you cant compare a driving game to a fps... its a silly comparison.


sure but even comparing HALO reach with the biggesdt and not mentionin KILLZONE 3 and older games ME2,UC2,GOW3 is silly

so before making a reply to puffy you should make the "silly" reply to selnor


I already replied to selnor and watered down what he said by merely pointing out that at the very least what these recent games show us is that the 360 wasnt maxed out when sony fans told us it was 2 years ago.

By the way... whats ME2?  Mass Effect2?  Halo Reach is a LOT better looking than ME2, even accounting for the MUCH larger scale of Reach compared to ME2.  (I bet ME2 wouldnt have been in that list a few days ago lol.)

you just replied to him about the maxed out thing but not the main point that he goes over and over again

about ME2 and REACH,i am talking about the games atm

and REACH "looking better doesn't do anything",we will see at release and even if its  better ME2 was a good looking game and it need a mention

"I bet ME2 wouldnt have been in that list a few days ago"

sure.........hehe


gotcha!!

gotcha!!

Confirmed Kowenicki doesn't understand jokesssssssss



tuscaniman on 19 August 2010
Solid_Snake4RD said:
tuscaniman said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
kowenicki said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
kowenicki said:
puffy said:
selnor said:
CGI-Quality said:

I've seen exclusive games out already that look better, but this does look good. It's just too bad the game itself isn't pulling me in.


Really? I mean really?

I think this is quite a step up to any exiting console game. Same with Rage and Crysis 2. The scale and lack of framerate drop when that HUGE monster came out was unmatched.

Seriously I have seen 3rd party devs this year shine in tech alot more than first party devs. 

Top of my technical achievement food chain right now from all the games Ive seen are

Rage

Followed by 

Crysis2/Bulletstorm

Possibly then followed by

LOS/GT5/Reach.

Then the rest.


So you haven't played God of War 3 then? Also, in what universe does Reach approach the technical achievements of Gran Turismo 5?

The game is looking pretty cool though and yes the graphics are top notch. 


you cant compare a driving game to a fps... its a silly comparison.


sure but even comparing HALO reach with the biggesdt and not mentionin KILLZONE 3 and older games ME2,UC2,GOW3 is silly

so before making a reply to puffy you should make the "silly" reply to selnor


I already replied to selnor and watered down what he said by merely pointing out that at the very least what these recent games show us is that the 360 wasnt maxed out when sony fans told us it was 2 years ago.

By the way... whats ME2?  Mass Effect2?  Halo Reach is a LOT better looking than ME2, even accounting for the MUCH larger scale of Reach compared to ME2.  (I bet ME2 wouldnt have been in that list a few days ago lol.)

 

you just replied to him about the maxed out thing but not the main point that he goes over and over again

about ME2 and REACH,i am talking about the games atm

and REACH "looking better doesn't do anything",we will see at release and even if its  better ME2 was a good looking game and it need a mention

"I bet ME2 wouldnt have been in that list a few days ago"

sure.........hehe


I don't know if you have played ME2 or not but I own it and the character models are top notch. Probably some of the best I've ever seen. But environmentally Reach is better and overall Reach is a better looking game. I played the Reach beta so I'm comparing it to ME2 btw. I'm sure the final product will look even better.

yes i have played ME2 and that why i was recommending it as one of the good ones

abt REACH,we don't know shit about it till next month

i'm not saying that REACH won't be good but just saying all those will be the best out there and then not even mentioning the biggest current games and some of the biggest upcoming is what selnor always does


Dude read my posts before responding. I have played the Reach beta. The beta itself looked better than ME2. Therefore the final game will look better. Its not hard to comprehend.



Boutros on 19 August 2010

We can expect Gears of War 3 to be even more beautiful since it's coming out a little after and it's exclusive and it's made by the same company using the same engine.



Boutros on 19 August 2010

Btw Reach is not a sandbox game lol



Solid_Snake4RD on 19 August 2010
tuscaniman said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
tuscaniman said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
kowenicki said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
kowenicki said:
puffy said:
selnor said:
CGI-Quality said:

I've seen exclusive games out already that look better, but this does look good. It's just too bad the game itself isn't pulling me in.


Really? I mean really?

I think this is quite a step up to any exiting console game. Same with Rage and Crysis 2. The scale and lack of framerate drop when that HUGE monster came out was unmatched.

Seriously I have seen 3rd party devs this year shine in tech alot more than first party devs. 

Top of my technical achievement food chain right now from all the games Ive seen are

Rage

Followed by 

Crysis2/Bulletstorm

Possibly then followed by

LOS/GT5/Reach.

Then the rest.


So you haven't played God of War 3 then? Also, in what universe does Reach approach the technical achievements of Gran Turismo 5?

The game is looking pretty cool though and yes the graphics are top notch. 


you cant compare a driving game to a fps... its a silly comparison.


sure but even comparing HALO reach with the biggesdt and not mentionin KILLZONE 3 and older games ME2,UC2,GOW3 is silly

so before making a reply to puffy you should make the "silly" reply to selnor


I already replied to selnor and watered down what he said by merely pointing out that at the very least what these recent games show us is that the 360 wasnt maxed out when sony fans told us it was 2 years ago.

By the way... whats ME2?  Mass Effect2?  Halo Reach is a LOT better looking than ME2, even accounting for the MUCH larger scale of Reach compared to ME2.  (I bet ME2 wouldnt have been in that list a few days ago lol.)

 

you just replied to him about the maxed out thing but not the main point that he goes over and over again

about ME2 and REACH,i am talking about the games atm

and REACH "looking better doesn't do anything",we will see at release and even if its  better ME2 was a good looking game and it need a mention

"I bet ME2 wouldnt have been in that list a few days ago"

sure.........hehe


I don't know if you have played ME2 or not but I own it and the character models are top notch. Probably some of the best I've ever seen. But environmentally Reach is better and overall Reach is a better looking game. I played the Reach beta so I'm comparing it to ME2 btw. I'm sure the final product will look even better.

yes i have played ME2 and that why i was recommending it as one of the good ones

abt REACH,we don't know shit about it till next month

i'm not saying that REACH won't be good but just saying all those will be the best out there and then not even mentioning the biggest current games and some of the biggest upcoming is what selnor always does


Dude read my posts before responding. I have played the Reach beta. The beta itself looked better than ME2. Therefore the final game will look better. Its not hard to comprehend.

i know.

it was the second sentence so i didn't erase mine...lazy

even if its better looking,selnors list is just wrong and i only mentioned past games as a comparision nothing else