kowenicki said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
kowenicki said:
puffy said:
selnor said:
CGI-Quality said:
I've seen exclusive games out already that look better, but this does look good. It's just too bad the game itself isn't pulling me in.
|
Really? I mean really?
I think this is quite a step up to any exiting console game. Same with Rage and Crysis 2. The scale and lack of framerate drop when that HUGE monster came out was unmatched.
Seriously I have seen 3rd party devs this year shine in tech alot more than first party devs.
Top of my technical achievement food chain right now from all the games Ive seen are
Rage
Followed by
Crysis2/Bulletstorm
Possibly then followed by
LOS/GT5/Reach.
Then the rest.
|
So you haven't played God of War 3 then? Also, in what universe does Reach approach the technical achievements of Gran Turismo 5?
The game is looking pretty cool though and yes the graphics are top notch.
|
you cant compare a driving game to a fps... its a silly comparison.
|
sure but even comparing HALO reach with the biggesdt and not mentionin KILLZONE 3 and older games ME2,UC2,GOW3 is silly
so before making a reply to puffy you should make the "silly" reply to selnor
|
I already replied to selnor and watered down what he said by merely pointing out that at the very least what these recent games show us is that the 360 wasnt maxed out when sony fans told us it was 2 years ago.
By the way... whats ME2? Mass Effect2? Halo Reach is a LOT better looking than ME2, even accounting for the MUCH larger scale of Reach compared to ME2. (I bet ME2 wouldnt have been in that list a few days ago lol.)
|
you just replied to him about the maxed out thing but not the main point that he goes over and over again
about ME2 and REACH,i am talking about the games atm
and REACH "looking better doesn't do anything",we will see at release and even if its better ME2 was a good looking game and it need a mention
"I bet ME2 wouldnt have been in that list a few days ago"
sure.........hehe
