unknown_soul89 said:
Icyedge said:
unknown_soul89 said:
Icyedge said:
Mr Puggsly said:
unknown_soul89 said:
Mr Puggsly said:
How is this thread not locked? Its such crap.
Going by shipped numbers a lone is ridiculous. I mean the title implies we're talking install base. Yet it shows shipped numbers?
|
yeah it shows the only accurate sales numbers in existence why on earth would someone use that?
|
Right, consoles sitting in shops counts as install base? Its just stupid.
|
But why shops would have more PS3s sitting than 360s? Im not taking any side or saying VGchartz numbers are wrong, im really wandering why since both console sale at a similar rate. Im a sales manager myself (not in the video game business) we only keep more of stuff that sales more. Does Sony ask for bigger minimum order than Microsoft? Does Sony deserve more store than Microsoft?
|
They wouldn't thats the reason the shipped numbers are accurate if your just looking at the difference between the install bases and not the actual install base but he wasn't able to figure that out, I've come to expect very little from his deduction skills and in general
|
Dont be too quick in making assumption either. We would need to know the number of store each sell to and what is the minimum order for each console. Do you have those informations? Im curious to see if shipped numbers would be closer to reality or not.
|
Just looked and can't find anything about a minimum number, but VG chartz has the ps3 over shipping 3 quarters in a row and thats just not possible so shipping is still our most accurate data
|
It makes sense for shipping to be more accurate. After all, shipped console have been purchase by a store. No reason to over purchase them. But still, there could be other factors in cause, so I wouldnt swear by it.