Ah ok, well, if I look at it that way then I agree. But as I said, there were many developers who succeeded in making equal versions, even in the PS3's first year, so other developers could do the same.

But I think the main reason why there are sometimes such big differences between PS3/X360 versions is because it's first developed for one console, then ported to the other one. And so I would still consider developers lazy because they just port it without really looking at the architecture of the PS3.

This, DirtyP is always doing these threads.

and btw the framerate isn't bad

so why do you think PS3 versions are lower quality????????????????

it surely isn't an inferior system

It's an inferior system in money/time limited scenarios. PS3 has a higher theorical limit, but you need more time (which equals money) to extract it's power, so It's natural that PS3 version is more times than not the inferior version. I'm sure 99% of the people here drives faster in a world rally car than in a F1, due to the time needed to learn to drive an F1 car, which is a very hard car to learn to drive.

PS: And I'm not comparing the power of both consoles to the top speed of both types of cars, I'm talking more of developing learning curve than absolute power.

This isn't Rockstar.

Who is it than I'm glad to here that!?

2K Czech team :)

Should be great.

Much thanks, I won't defile rockstars name any further, but 2k's czech can kiss my ass, I stick to my original statement.

that fine but if they start to develop on the higher system then they can do the same in that cost

uncharted 2 just cost $20m so this shouldn't be a problem

To their defence, it looks like they put all resources in to the PC version.

Its natively 3D enabled, it supports physx effects...looks top notch.

Both consoles are jsut an afterthought. Sadly 360 is easier to do afterthought developing for than PS3 :)