By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - AMAZING Halo Reach Beta video montage!!!!!

yo_john117 on 12 August 2010
SleepWaking said:
yo_john117 said:
SleepWaking said:

If we are using the vgchartz name I'm pretty sure we could get a thread stickied. Things like this could even attract new members.

That would be awesome...September 14th can't come soon enough!


I'm with you on that. Coincidently Reach releases at the same day as the start of the new academic year for me. Which on one hand sucks, on the other hand though I'm really looking forward to both. Still Bungie always knows how to plan things like this, same thing with the Reach beta which was at exact the same time and length as my exams were.

Haha yeah they do time their game releases and such at pretty bad times lol, and yes a Vgchartz Halo clan would be pretty tight.



Around the Network
yo_john117 on 12 August 2010
BenVTrigger said:

Alright guys we are for sure 100% doing a Halo Reach montage.  It'll be amazing for the site and it will be the official one.  I'm a member over at bungie.net as well so once we make our montage I'll start a thread over there and hopefully we can attract some more 360 gamers over to the site.   This is going to be freaking EPIC!!!!!!!

From this point onward the official founders of the VGChartz Halo Reach Epic Montage are as follows in no specific order.

BenVTrigger

Yo_john117

Sleepwaking

We'll deff have to recruit more members once the game launches and make an awesome video.  If its good enough Bungie themselves might even post it on their news section.  They did it for NeoGafs Halo 3 montage.  

Hell yeah.

I'm pretty sure JaggedSac, Kieffer, and Mendicate Bias will be interested in participating in the montage too (and they are all pretty sick at Halo)



BenVTrigger on 12 August 2010
yo_john117 said:
BenVTrigger said:

Alright guys we are for sure 100% doing a Halo Reach montage.  It'll be amazing for the site and it will be the official one.  I'm a member over at bungie.net as well so once we make our montage I'll start a thread over there and hopefully we can attract some more 360 gamers over to the site.   This is going to be freaking EPIC!!!!!!!

From this point onward the official founders of the VGChartz Halo Reach Epic Montage are as follows in no specific order.

BenVTrigger

Yo_john117

Sleepwaking

We'll deff have to recruit more members once the game launches and make an awesome video.  If its good enough Bungie themselves might even post it on their news section.  They did it for NeoGafs Halo 3 montage.  

Hell yeah.

I'm pretty sure JaggedSac, Kieffer, and Mendicate Bias will be interested in participating in the montage too (and they are all pretty sick at Halo)


yeah I figured they would all for sure be part of it too. 



raygun on 12 August 2010

I was trying to state that I didn't see anything new or different in the reach clips, sure if you compare Reach to halo 3, the maps are bigger, and it does look better. BUT, bigger maps is nothing new, UT3 maps are huge, as well as Warhawk, and that's just 2 of the many others that look better, and have bigger maps. So why is Halo so popular? Sorry if I ruffled your feathers, don't be so sensitive! I may be biased, i've played the UT franchise for years, but it seems to me that Ut has much more depth and diversity, with huge maps since the first UT, as well as smaller, tight fast maps. So when I hear someone fussing over the fact that Reach has big maps, I say....so? Of course I may be missing the reason for the op, just some Halo fans wanting to tell each other how great Halo is, not wanting any feedback. UT3 has been out for years, try it! 

p.s. i'm not anti-360, just anti Halo hype, I have played Halo on pc.



yo_john117 on 12 August 2010
raygun said:

I was trying to state that I didn't see anything new or different in the reach clips, sure if you compare Reach to halo 3, the maps are bigger, and it does look better. BUT, bigger maps is nothing new, UT3 maps are huge, as well as Warhawk, and that's just 2 of the many others that look better, and have bigger maps. So why is Halo so popular? Sorry if I ruffled your feathers, don't be so sensitive! I may be biased, i've played the UT franchise for years, but it seems to me that Ut has much more depth and diversity, with huge maps since the first UT, as well as smaller, tight fast maps. So when I hear someone fussing over the fact that Reach has big maps, I say....so? Of course I may be missing the reason for the op, just some Halo fans wanting to tell each other how great Halo is, not wanting any feedback. UT3 has been out for years, try it! 

p.s. i'm not anti-360, just anti Halo hype, I have played Halo on pc.

lol



Around the Network
Akvod on 12 August 2010
raygun said:

I was trying to state that I didn't see anything new or different in the reach clips, sure if you compare Reach to halo 3, the maps are bigger, and it does look better. BUT, bigger maps is nothing new, UT3 maps are huge, as well as Warhawk, and that's just 2 of the many others that look better, and have bigger maps. So why is Halo so popular? Sorry if I ruffled your feathers, don't be so sensitive! I may be biased, i've played the UT franchise for years, but it seems to me that Ut has much more depth and diversity, with huge maps since the first UT, as well as smaller, tight fast maps. So when I hear someone fussing over the fact that Reach has big maps, I say....so? Of course I may be missing the reason for the op, just some Halo fans wanting to tell each other how great Halo is, not wanting any feedback. UT3 has been out for years, try it! 

p.s. i'm not anti-360, just anti Halo hype, I have played Halo on pc.

UT isn't a big name for consoles, and Warhawk  was for the PS3. I mean, I know what you old PC guys say, but for us consoles, stuff like this is new considering where we started (Socom, Halo, Medal of Honor, CoD all for consoles).



Akvod on 12 August 2010
yo_john117 said:
raygun said:

I was trying to state that I didn't see anything new or different in the reach clips, sure if you compare Reach to halo 3, the maps are bigger, and it does look better. BUT, bigger maps is nothing new, UT3 maps are huge, as well as Warhawk, and that's just 2 of the many others that look better, and have bigger maps. So why is Halo so popular? Sorry if I ruffled your feathers, don't be so sensitive! I may be biased, i've played the UT franchise for years, but it seems to me that Ut has much more depth and diversity, with huge maps since the first UT, as well as smaller, tight fast maps. So when I hear someone fussing over the fact that Reach has big maps, I say....so? Of course I may be missing the reason for the op, just some Halo fans wanting to tell each other how great Halo is, not wanting any feedback. UT3 has been out for years, try it! 

p.s. i'm not anti-360, just anti Halo hype, I have played Halo on pc.

lol

Don't just blow other people's posts off. If you're going to ignore them and not read them, don't make such a useless 3 letter post. God, I serously hate the attitude of PS3 and 360 owners. It's not 2006 anymore. Sheesh.



yo_john117 on 12 August 2010
Akvod said:
yo_john117 said:
raygun said:

I was trying to state that I didn't see anything new or different in the reach clips, sure if you compare Reach to halo 3, the maps are bigger, and it does look better. BUT, bigger maps is nothing new, UT3 maps are huge, as well as Warhawk, and that's just 2 of the many others that look better, and have bigger maps. So why is Halo so popular? Sorry if I ruffled your feathers, don't be so sensitive! I may be biased, i've played the UT franchise for years, but it seems to me that Ut has much more depth and diversity, with huge maps since the first UT, as well as smaller, tight fast maps. So when I hear someone fussing over the fact that Reach has big maps, I say....so? Of course I may be missing the reason for the op, just some Halo fans wanting to tell each other how great Halo is, not wanting any feedback. UT3 has been out for years, try it! 

p.s. i'm not anti-360, just anti Halo hype, I have played Halo on pc.

lol

Don't just blow other people's posts off. If you're going to ignore them and not read them, don't make such a useless 3 letter post. God, I serously hate the attitude of PS3 and 360 owners. It's not 2006 anymore. Sheesh.

What? i was being honest....his post made me laugh.

And you need to settle down.



damndl0ser on 12 August 2010
yo_john117 said:
Akvod said:
yo_john117 said:
raygun said:

I was trying to state that I didn't see anything new or different in the reach clips, sure if you compare Reach to halo 3, the maps are bigger, and it does look better. BUT, bigger maps is nothing new, UT3 maps are huge, as well as Warhawk, and that's just 2 of the many others that look better, and have bigger maps. So why is Halo so popular? Sorry if I ruffled your feathers, don't be so sensitive! I may be biased, i've played the UT franchise for years, but it seems to me that Ut has much more depth and diversity, with huge maps since the first UT, as well as smaller, tight fast maps. So when I hear someone fussing over the fact that Reach has big maps, I say....so? Of course I may be missing the reason for the op, just some Halo fans wanting to tell each other how great Halo is, not wanting any feedback. UT3 has been out for years, try it! 

p.s. i'm not anti-360, just anti Halo hype, I have played Halo on pc.

lol

Don't just blow other people's posts off. If you're going to ignore them and not read them, don't make such a useless 3 letter post. God, I serously hate the attitude of PS3 and 360 owners. It's not 2006 anymore. Sheesh.

What? i was being honest....his post made me laugh.

And you need to settle down.


This post originated for people to talk about Reach montages, not whats been out longer and which game is best or who's graphix kicks that stupid halo's ass?  We hear that shit all the time.  If you want to talk about all that other stuff who's stopping you from posting your own thread about whatever the heck you wanted to go on about?  So theres nothing wrong with someone laughing at the guy, he was here just to stir shit up and it gets tiresome.   It also gets tiresome watching other people defending them.  What did he that poster really add to this thread that was on topic?  NOTHING.....  and neither did the guy that was defending him.   How hard is it for people to understand that?  Jeez..........

Can't we get just one thread abot the 360 that isn't negative here?  I know thats just asking for to much.



"If you've got them by the balls their hearts and minds will follow."

Quote by- The Imortal John Wayne, the original BADASS!

 

 

 

Akvod on 13 August 2010
damndl0ser said:
yo_john117 said:
Akvod said:
yo_john117 said:
raygun said:

I was trying to state that I didn't see anything new or different in the reach clips, sure if you compare Reach to halo 3, the maps are bigger, and it does look better. BUT, bigger maps is nothing new, UT3 maps are huge, as well as Warhawk, and that's just 2 of the many others that look better, and have bigger maps. So why is Halo so popular? Sorry if I ruffled your feathers, don't be so sensitive! I may be biased, i've played the UT franchise for years, but it seems to me that Ut has much more depth and diversity, with huge maps since the first UT, as well as smaller, tight fast maps. So when I hear someone fussing over the fact that Reach has big maps, I say....so? Of course I may be missing the reason for the op, just some Halo fans wanting to tell each other how great Halo is, not wanting any feedback. UT3 has been out for years, try it! 

p.s. i'm not anti-360, just anti Halo hype, I have played Halo on pc.

lol

Don't just blow other people's posts off. If you're going to ignore them and not read them, don't make such a useless 3 letter post. God, I serously hate the attitude of PS3 and 360 owners. It's not 2006 anymore. Sheesh.

What? i was being honest....his post made me laugh.

And you need to settle down.


This post originated for people to talk about Reach montages, not whats been out longer and which game is best or who's graphix kicks that stupid halo's ass?  We hear that shit all the time.  If you want to talk about all that other stuff who's stopping you from posting your own thread about whatever the heck you wanted to go on about?  So theres nothing wrong with someone laughing at the guy, he was here just to stir shit up and it gets tiresome.   It also gets tiresome watching other people defending them.  What did he that poster really add to this thread that was on topic?  NOTHING.....  and neither did the guy that was defending him.   How hard is it for people to understand that?  Jeez..........

Can't we get just one thread abot the 360 that isn't negative here?  I know thats just asking for to much.

The thing was about Reach's montage, and what you thought of it correct?

You guys will say: "Awesome, because it's X, Y, and Z!"

Example: X will be big maps.

He's contesting: "It's NOT awesome, because X isn't that big or new of a thing".

I replied: "It's new for consoles, while maybe not for PC"

yo_john: LOL

You: Whaaa, he de-railed it because he didn't say it was awesomeeeeee. If you want to say something negative about the Halo Reach Beta video, make a thread call "BAD Halo Reach Beta video montage!!!!". Because we really need one thread for a single opinion, rather than one thread for a multitude of opinions.

 

Look, if for example, he just said "UT and Warhawk are better" then that will just be deconstructive. If this was simply a hype thread, this will be derailing. But he was specifically saying that he didn't think the features of Reach displayed in that montage were amazing, because they're not groundbreaking. You could have either addressed his point, or ignore him.

However, just saying "lol" is the same as boosting your post count. It doesn't add ANYTHING to this forum. It's simply useless, and immature.

If you felt he was being deconstructive, be the better man, and just report and ignore him.