damndl0ser said:
yo_john117 said:
Akvod said:
yo_john117 said:
raygun said:
I was trying to state that I didn't see anything new or different in the reach clips, sure if you compare Reach to halo 3, the maps are bigger, and it does look better. BUT, bigger maps is nothing new, UT3 maps are huge, as well as Warhawk, and that's just 2 of the many others that look better, and have bigger maps. So why is Halo so popular? Sorry if I ruffled your feathers, don't be so sensitive! I may be biased, i've played the UT franchise for years, but it seems to me that Ut has much more depth and diversity, with huge maps since the first UT, as well as smaller, tight fast maps. So when I hear someone fussing over the fact that Reach has big maps, I say....so? Of course I may be missing the reason for the op, just some Halo fans wanting to tell each other how great Halo is, not wanting any feedback. UT3 has been out for years, try it!
p.s. i'm not anti-360, just anti Halo hype, I have played Halo on pc.
|
lol
|
Don't just blow other people's posts off. If you're going to ignore them and not read them, don't make such a useless 3 letter post. God, I serously hate the attitude of PS3 and 360 owners. It's not 2006 anymore. Sheesh.
|
What? i was being honest....his post made me laugh.
And you need to settle down.
|
This post originated for people to talk about Reach montages, not whats been out longer and which game is best or who's graphix kicks that stupid halo's ass? We hear that shit all the time. If you want to talk about all that other stuff who's stopping you from posting your own thread about whatever the heck you wanted to go on about? So theres nothing wrong with someone laughing at the guy, he was here just to stir shit up and it gets tiresome. It also gets tiresome watching other people defending them. What did he that poster really add to this thread that was on topic? NOTHING..... and neither did the guy that was defending him. How hard is it for people to understand that? Jeez..........
Can't we get just one thread abot the 360 that isn't negative here? I know thats just asking for to much.
|
The thing was about Reach's montage, and what you thought of it correct?
You guys will say: "Awesome, because it's X, Y, and Z!"
Example: X will be big maps.
He's contesting: "It's NOT awesome, because X isn't that big or new of a thing".
I replied: "It's new for consoles, while maybe not for PC"
yo_john: LOL
You: Whaaa, he de-railed it because he didn't say it was awesomeeeeee. If you want to say something negative about the Halo Reach Beta video, make a thread call "BAD Halo Reach Beta video montage!!!!". Because we really need one thread for a single opinion, rather than one thread for a multitude of opinions.
Look, if for example, he just said "UT and Warhawk are better" then that will just be deconstructive. If this was simply a hype thread, this will be derailing. But he was specifically saying that he didn't think the features of Reach displayed in that montage were amazing, because they're not groundbreaking. You could have either addressed his point, or ignore him.
However, just saying "lol" is the same as boosting your post count. It doesn't add ANYTHING to this forum. It's simply useless, and immature.
If you felt he was being deconstructive, be the better man, and just report and ignore him.
