By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
tehsage said:

Tell me why it's wrong in the case of wanting to be dating or having sex or anything. For the sake of this argument, let's assume that we're not talking about procreation or anything.

 

Also, "it's gross" is not a reason.


Well, besides it's gross. I can think of two excellent reasons:

  • I'm fairly sure it's against the law
  • Your kids would come out retarded
  • The law thing is debatable and is really up to location and personal eithics so it's easy to throw that one out, but if you willingly did your sister or whatever, you know your kid is likely to come out stupid.  And you may say you're not trying to have a kid or you used protection, but mistakes happen all the time.

    I have absolutely nothing against the mentally handicap, but it takes a special type of wicked person to do something they know will likely produce someone that is going to go through a life of extreme hardships.



    Around the Network

    As far as "damaging the gene pool" you could make the same argument about medication. Medication helps the weak stay alive long enough to procreate thus passing on weakness to future generations.

    My opinion is that I have no opinion. It's yet another thing where I think people should just mind their own business. However, I do think there is a strong potential for a control situation to occur. That I am 100% against.

    I think everyone should be allowed to do what they want as long as they aren't hurting or impeding anyone else.



    GodOfWar_3ever said:
    FaRmLaNd said:
    hatmoza said:

    Ya know, I like to believe I'm a reasonable person who hears people out. Although I may not agree with some opinions, I tend to see where people are coming from. However, some stuff can't be justified, and this is one of them imo.


    Most people nearly instictively feel a certain level of discust when it comes to incest. I know I certainly do. May I ask why it can't be justified in your opinion?

    Because its just not right...doing your sister...the very thought of that is disturbing.

    some people don't think so. Some people are just repulsed by their siblings, others are very close. I have no siblings, so I could never understand, but I don't dare stereotype every sibling relationship as being one of revulsion or even simply toleration.

    Also, that idea is a construct of our society. Hundreds of years ago, incest was very prevalent, and not such a taboo.



    Justin said:

    Wow, shit just got real on VGchartz.


    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA 

    omg i think this is quite possibly the single greatest post I have ever seen on this website and I've been a member since 2008.

    Lol the response was just too perfect!



    pbroy said:


    If you think that's bad...



    Around the Network

    ugh...this thread just brought up a bad memory of me walkin in on both my mom and sis in their "birthday suit"....I think that killed my sex drive for like a year(not that I had and sexual feeling towards them....I'll just stop)

    anyway, it just gross, plain n' simple



    Why incest is wrong:

    -Your sister has the best poon tang in the world and it would totally spoil you for any other woman.

    -You can't break up with a sibling because they'll always be in your life.

    -Younger siblings tend to respect older siblings.  Have sex with somebody whom you have power over.  That's abuse.

    -It's gross.



    theprof00 said:

    As far as "damaging the gene pool" you could make the same argument about medication. Medication helps the weak stay alive long enough to procreate thus passing on weakness to future generations.

    My opinion is that I have no opinion. It's yet another thing where I think people should just mind their own business. However, I do think there is a strong potential for a control situation to occur. That I am 100% against.

    I think everyone should be allowed to do what they want as long as they aren't hurting or impeding anyone else.

    I'm not talking about damaging the gene pool through mutation, I'm saying reduced genetic diversity weakens the human race and leaves us more vulnerable to diesease etcetera.

    Also as humans is pure physical fitness all that matters any more? I'd say a person with high intelligence is possibly more genetically valuable than a person who is physically very strong...?



    d21lewis said:

    -It's gross.


    He said it, it's the truth.

     

    I don't know why it's wrong. It's just that, I grew up believing it's wrong.

    It certainly is wrong when the whole world thinks it's wrong.

    Even when Earth was believed to be flat, it was really flat and the truth way back.

     

    So, maybe in several thousand years, incest will no longer be gross. But at this point, it is universally accepted as gross.



    source

    Study demonstrates sexual attraction to those who resemble our parents, ourselves July 28, 2010 by Lin Edwards

    (PhysOrg.com) -- Researchers reporting in the Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin last week say people are drawn to others who resemble their parents or themselves. This may explain why incest taboos are found in many cultures - to counter a natural tendency.

    University of Illinois psychologist, Chris Fraley, said there had been a century-long debate on whether incest taboos are psychological or cultural adaptations designed to suppress a biological urge. In the early 20th century Sigmund Freud, a psychoanalyst, proposed it was psychological, while Edward Westermarck, a sociologist, proposed it was cultural. Westermarck thought there was a critical time in childhood during which people would not find attractive people who were raising them or raised with them.

    Most modern researchers think Westermarck was correct, but a new study led by Fraley suggests there may also be a psychological component in which we align ourselves with our kin, who are genetically close to us.

    The research involved three experiments. In the first, volunteers were shown pictures of strangers’ faces and asked to rate them on sexual attractiveness. They were unaware that they were also being shown photographs just before the strangers’ faces, and these were flashed so quickly they could only be processed subliminally. Half the volunteers were flashed a picture of their opposite gender parent, while the remaining subjects were flashed a picture of an unrelated person.

    The results of this experiment were that those who were exposed to a picture of their parent generally found the stranger's face more sexually attractive than those who were shown the photo of an unrelated person.

    A second experiment used images of two faces morphed together. The control group was shown images of faces of strangers morphed together, but the other subjects were shown faces that were composites of a stranger's face and (unknowingly) up to 45% their own face. They then rated the sexual attractiveness of the morph.

    In this experiment the subjects shown images containing their own face found the picture more sexually attractive.

    In the final experiment the volunteers were again shown composite pictures, and half were told the composites included their own faces, while the rest were not. In fact none of the composites contained the subjects’ faces. They were again asked to rate their sexual attractiveness.

    The results showed the subjects who believed the composites contained their own image rated it as less sexually attractive than those who did not.

    Fraley said all the experiments support Freud’s argument that we are subconsciously attracted to features reminiscent of our own, and cultural aversions to incest were developed to override the “primitive drive.” So when we are aware of the relationship we are not sexually attracted, but when the awareness is bypassed we are in fact more sexually attracted to our kin.

    Another explanation for the results is that our brains can simply process familiar images more easily, and Fraley said further experiments are needed to test this idea.

    More information: Westermarck, Freud, and the Incest Taboo: Does Familial Resemblance Activate Sexual Attraction? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Published online before print July 20, 2010, doi:10.1177/0146167210377180

    © 2010 PhysOrg.com