Lost tears of Kain said: Why the hell is pc gamer reviewing mass effect. Its only for 360 currently they have zero authority Thats like xbox 360 magazine reviewing pc games. BTW dont really care mass effect is a far greater game in my opinion and you can argue all you want. Blaming the reviews on money hats is just plain low.....seriously You cant use half your stuff half the things you say are not "facts" but your opinions Seriously being hyped has nothing to do with it, multiple games with goty hype have gotten less, look at AC it was hyped as GOTY and is getting respectable 83-85 average. I wont judge the witcher but all i can say is you have not played mass effect so leave it at that |
how can you say Mass Effect is better if you've never played the Witcher? And yes I played Mass Effect (still am)
your point about AC only proves my point, the game is STILL getting a decent average. If it were released by an unknown developer the game would've gotten below 80 definitely. AC isn't any good.
Want another point? The fact that the PC version of Gears of War is averaging 87% with help of the scores that the 360 version got and hype. Gears of War is only an slightly above average FPS on PC.
The main reason some reviewers didn't give a better score to the Witcher is because of the 'outdated' look and their unwilingness to deepen the game's experience. And again, PC games are different: a 80% PC game equals to 90% console game. Fallout had below 90% and is considered one of the best RPG's ever, same with Planescape Torment, and other PC games. System Shock 2 only had like 90% yet it is more highly regarded than Bioshock, which had 95% on consoles.