So why does XBLA have more de facto exclusives than PSN?
So why does XBLA have more de facto exclusives than PSN?
| themanwithnoname said: So why does XBLA have more de facto exclusives than PSN? |
My guess is because 1) its been around longer and 2) MS keeps the games they publish for themselves, which is probably a good amount. Factor in devs who believe XBLA gives them a better shot and there you go. Im guessing. If someone knows a more factual reason I would like to know as well.

I am a gamer. Not a fanboy, not a troll, a gamer. So when you dont like what I have to say, remember this fact.
steverhcp02 said:
Unless one is officially representing a group of people or claims to be, i dont understand why people dont understand whats being said is their/his feelings on the mater. Had he said "its a fact...." or something along those lines id be right next to you, but its easy to distinguish that hes giving a presentation, or answering a question and giving what HE FEELS and giving reasons that his company chose what they did. EDIT: and claiming someones not smart enough for anything isnt being smart ass, its a personal insult....theyre quite distinguishable |
LOL at edit...In your first quote, didnt you humourously implied that i wasnt smart enough to know that the developer is not part of VGchartz..Go back and compare what you wrote and what I wrote it was clearly a mimick of your first post.
I never said that it was a fact, read my previous post, I clearly said "it just seems like" he was. As implying slaughter house for small developers, based on a so called research.

steverhcp02 said:
No, thats how he feels. Maybe the company you mentioned is doing fine. But the gentlemen speaking on behalf of his company doesnt feel the conditions are conducive to what he wants for his employees or himself. Why is it so wrong he feels differently than you? Its his business to run, its just his opinion form his presentation....why cant he feel differently about the terms or conditions of th emarket in which hes running a business. Not saying i agree with him, but youre argueing against a competitive marketplace and a companies choice of how to sell its product. Theres simply no right or wrong. |
i have no problem with his choice of how he sells his product. i have an issue with him making the claim that the one service is a slaughterhouse...a place designed for the destruction of small developers. if i said that blacks are rapists and whites are murderers, is this ok? its my opinion so everyone should just accept that i feel differently than them and accept my claims.
"I like my steaks how i like my women. Bloody and all over my face"
"Its like sex, but with a winner!"

MrBubbles Review Threads: Bill Gates, Jak II, Kingdom Hearts II, The Strangers, Sly 2, Crackdown, Zohan, Quarantine, Klungo Sssavesss Teh World, MS@E3'08, WATCHMEN(movie), Shadow of the Colossus, The Saboteur
JerzeeBalla said:
My guess is because 1) its been around longer and 2) MS keeps the games they publish for themselves, which is probably a good amount. Factor in devs who believe XBLA gives them a better shot and there you go. Im guessing. If someone knows a more factual reason I would like to know as well. |
Maybe mrstickball can help us out here. He seems to know a lot about XBLA.
They had an opportunity but they chose not to partake in it. I wonder if the small quantity of venom in his words are due to disapointment in himself for not also publishing on Live. After the fact he could probably do the mathematics in his head because his game would have been a top tier game on Live so therefore its sales would have reflected not the competition or average potential but closer to the top potential sales a game can typically expect.
So depending on where and how you figure the numbers he got between half and 1/3rd of his overall potential revenue had he released multiplatform.
| MrBubbles said: i have no problem with his choice of how he sells his product. i have an issue with him making the claim that the one service is a slaughterhouse...a place designed for the destruction of small developers. if i said that blacks are rapists and whites are murderers, is this ok? its my opinion so everyone should just accept that i feel differently than them and accept my claims. |
really? Thats your argument? really? wow.
steverhcp02 said:
really? Thats your argument? really? wow. |
it provides a perfect illustration. now you need accept that view or admit you are wrong.
"I like my steaks how i like my women. Bloody and all over my face"
"Its like sex, but with a winner!"

MrBubbles Review Threads: Bill Gates, Jak II, Kingdom Hearts II, The Strangers, Sly 2, Crackdown, Zohan, Quarantine, Klungo Sssavesss Teh World, MS@E3'08, WATCHMEN(movie), Shadow of the Colossus, The Saboteur
MrBubbles said:
it provides a perfect illustration. now you need accept that view or admit you are wrong. |
No, it surely does not. Making comments about rape and murder as if they are some joke or some chess piece to your debate is childish and immature.
Anytime someone uses incredibly extreme (and usually tasteless) analogies it shows a weak counterpoint because they feel the need to be overly compensating for their lack of argument by making shock comments to prove some absolute extreme.
Youre lack of ability to distinguish the difference from racism, tasteless very serious accusations that are not only illegal acts but traumatizing acts and a game devloper stating a reason for wanting to publish a game themselves on a different platform is rather sad.
| MrBubbles said: ninjabee is a small team(3 employees according to their wiki page) and have made a number of good games for xbla(including the recently released Ancients of Ooga[go buy it]). they dont feel that need to work in less competitive environment just because they are a small team and clearly dont feel that theyve been slaughtered... |