Chairman-Mao said:
Sooo....the only blockbuster games this gen have been GTA4, Halo 3 and MW2? I'm pretty sure those are the only ones that have done even close to 3 million in week 1.
|
That and any Wii and DS games that do similar figures (there are many) . Anything under 5 million is little more than filler.
iWarMachine said:
poor RAZurrection...trying to justify its choice by downplaying the competition....how sad is that? =/
|
I'm judging all by the same standards. It's not my fault Sony doesn't have blockbuster game for 2011...that might have something to do with them being last place. Just a thought.
iWarMachine said:
it's ok RAZ, it's not your fault that Sony's bought Naughty Dog...it's not your fault that you can't play Uncharted 2...at least you have Fable 2, and Milo and Kate.
|
I think the irony here is that one of those games which is filler on Xbox 360 is more successful commercially than what was supposed to be the biggest title on PS3. You can diss on Fable and Molyneux all you like, he's bringing in the numbers...a PS3 game has to FLYYY to reach Lionheads averages. And Naughty Dog? Really? How times have changed, I doubt PS2 fanboys would have championed Jak 2 as the savior of gaming....but then they had bigger exclusives back then...and weren't as desperate.
Ajescent said:
You just made that up didn't you?
|
No. I usually have about a 5 million "low end" blockbuster, tbh it's borderline, the seminal few elevated above the unremarkable 3 million figures of Lego Indiana Jones, Kung Fu Panda and Uncharted 2, the real meat is in the 10-15m sellers and beyond and I apply that equally to all systems...some people are upset because some systems, that shall remain nameless, don't have any exclusive software that does that.