http://images.idgentertainment.de/images/idgwpgsgp/bdb/2115745/prop.jpg
http://images.idgentertainment.de/images/gamestar/bdb/2115743/prop.jpg
http://images.idgentertainment.de/images/gamestar/bdb/2115742/prop.jpg
http://images.idgentertainment.de/images/gamestar/bdb/2115741/prop.jpg

Sorry, can't embed with my browser. Looks nice.

Source: http://www.gamestar.de/news/pc/strategie/rundenstrategie/2315704/civilization_5.html

I've always hated the design of Civilzation. It's prevented me from ever getting into it and ejoying it, although there's other things too that I didn't like with it.

It don't seem much better this time, sadly. I love strategy and I love history, so it's a pity I am not allowed to love Vililization.

Looks good, but still doesn't tell us much about how it plays. It did seem that in a few shots cities can grow to more than 1 tile.

i like it, if my pc can handle i'll buy it

What the hell. Seems like you somehow have issues with all of my favorite western series! I notice because I don't like that many. But what's the problem here, too complicated?

The game is looking great though. I want some videos!

I like and can't wait for this.

Civilization III is the game that holds more Nostalgia for me than any other game. While Civ V still worries me in a few aspects, it seems to be better than Civ IV (which was good, but severely flawed).

Looks like Civ 4 mixed with Rise of Nations....weird, but it could be excellent...well, it should

No, not too complicated. I like complicated.

It's the game design and presentation I never liked. It's clumsy and ugly. For example I don't like the isometric perspective, not how it is done in Civilization. The stuff on the map aren't proportional. U know in Age of Empires the units were bigger than the buildings, but it was made in a cool way, while in Civ it all looks out of place.  I also hate the humoristic style of the leaders and dialogue.

Looks amazing.