By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
theprof00 on 16 June 2010
theARTIST0017 said:
theprof00 said:
theARTIST0017 said:
theprof00 said:
RolStoppable said:

I just watched the Sorcery gameplay on youtube. So that's the game that makes people go "wow".

It didn't really "wow" me as much to say that right after watchin zelda, it seemed to have many of the same elements, but with a different setting, abilities, and tricks as well as puzzles and expandability.

The two seem very similar, and honestly I was very disappointed with zelda. I expected a lot more. Nothing has changed, and the presentation was nearly a disaster.

With sorcery, it feels like the kind of change zelda should have gotten. It's something different.


Ok dude. Whoah, lets go back to what you said. The kind of change Zelda should have gotten? WHAT?! Are you serious?! I bet you right now Socrcery wont be getting 9's when it come out. Zelda's presentation was a disaster? Why? Because of some technical difficulties note because the games is bad. Zelda > Sorcery IN EVERY WAY. Graphics, gameplay you name it bub.

So if you think Zelda should have gotten the kind of change similar to game like Sorcery, that would be a true disaster. Sorcery does not = Zelda.

I wouldn't want zelda to be like sorcery. I just would like something that isn't ocarina of time with a different artstyle.

OK THEN! So then why are you contradicting yourself?! FIRST you said its the kind of change Zelda should have gotten. THEN, you said you don't want Zelda to be like Sorcery. Come on man its beggining to sound like you're dragging up excuese becasuse Zelda had bad presentration. AND you wouldn't want Ocorina of Time with better graphics. 1. We don't know much about the game. 2. Ocorina of Time is the highest rated game of all time.

It only feels like excuses because you're being defensive.

the full quote was

"it Kind of feels like the change zelda should have gotten. It's something different"

I think you are interpreting it the wrong way. Or maybe I'm really just bad at conveying my points. But I think it's pretty clear. It doesn't say anything in there about wanting zelda to be like sorcery. It does say that Zelda should have been changed in a way that is equal to the difference between the two styles. IE, inasmuch as sorcery is different from zelda, zelda should have differentiated itself similarly from past zeldas.

Look at Legend of Zelda, Adventures of Link, Link to the past, Ocarina, Windwaker, four swords.

All very very different games. The last 5 zelda games? Ocarina, Majora, Wind waker, TP, and this one. 4 of them are almost carbon copies save for some graphical change or minor gameplay element.

Zelda deserves to do something different, and M is not that special to make a zelda feel unique.



Around the Network
darthdevidem01 on 16 June 2010

Sorcery looks AWESOME imo.

And drinking the potion when it changes colour, oh I don't care if it looked like a gimmick it was pretty damn cool.

But the Zelda PRess reactions say its very accurate and so on, so give Zelda the benefit of doubt

BOTH are day 1 games and I hope sorcery is polished up and so on by SONY

But it does show the potential Move has with these kind of games.



All hail the KING, Andrespetmonkey

scottie on 16 June 2010
RolStoppable said:
theprof00 said:
Metallicube said:

I love how the Zelda controls had a little bit of interference during the bow and arrow demo and now people are so quick to say it's going to suck, or that some no name Move title is going to own it, despite all acounts saying the motion controls for the game work great. 

Are you sure you guys don't just WANT Zelda to fail?

I think you and peachbuggy completely skipped the part in the OP about "Zelda like we've seen a thousand times before"

And I think you've skipped the part where you said that you weren't serious about everything you said in your OP. But don't worry. On Thursday, right when you've caught up on your missing sleep and the new week starts, you won't make such oversights again.

 

Weeks start on a thursday now?



theARTIST0017 on 16 June 2010
theprof00 said:
theARTIST0017 said:
theprof00 said:
theARTIST0017 said:
theprof00 said:
RolStoppable said:

I just watched the Sorcery gameplay on youtube. So that's the game that makes people go "wow".

It didn't really "wow" me as much to say that right after watchin zelda, it seemed to have many of the same elements, but with a different setting, abilities, and tricks as well as puzzles and expandability.

The two seem very similar, and honestly I was very disappointed with zelda. I expected a lot more. Nothing has changed, and the presentation was nearly a disaster.

With sorcery, it feels like the kind of change zelda should have gotten. It's something different.


Ok dude. Whoah, lets go back to what you said. The kind of change Zelda should have gotten? WHAT?! Are you serious?! I bet you right now Socrcery wont be getting 9's when it come out. Zelda's presentation was a disaster? Why? Because of some technical difficulties note because the games is bad. Zelda > Sorcery IN EVERY WAY. Graphics, gameplay you name it bub.

So if you think Zelda should have gotten the kind of change similar to game like Sorcery, that would be a true disaster. Sorcery does not = Zelda.

I wouldn't want zelda to be like sorcery. I just would like something that isn't ocarina of time with a different artstyle.

OK THEN! So then why are you contradicting yourself?! FIRST you said its the kind of change Zelda should have gotten. THEN, you said you don't want Zelda to be like Sorcery. Come on man its beggining to sound like you're dragging up excuese becasuse Zelda had bad presentration. AND you wouldn't want Ocorina of Time with better graphics. 1. We don't know much about the game. 2. Ocorina of Time is the highest rated game of all time.

It only feels like excuses because you're being defensive.

the full quote was

"it Kind of feels like the change zelda should have gotten. It's something different"

I think you are interpreting it the wrong way. Or maybe I'm really just bad at conveying my points. But I think it's pretty clear. It doesn't say anything in there about wanting zelda to be like sorcery. It does say that Zelda should have been changed in a way that is equal to the difference between the two styles. IE, inasmuch as sorcery is different from zelda, zelda should have differentiated itself similarly from past zeldas.

Look at Legend of Zelda, Adventures of Link, Link to the past, Ocarina, Windwaker, four swords.

All very very different games. The last 5 zelda games? Ocarina, Majora, Wind waker, TP, and this one. 4 of them are almost carbon copies save for some graphical change or minor gameplay element.

Zelda deserves to do something different, and M is not that special to make a zelda feel unique.


Ok I understand that part. But still. No need to cast judgement and say Sorcery > Zelda: SS 

I'm in favor of Skyward Sword because I feel, this is the kind of game that most fans want, i mean as a Zelda fan myslef I know I want it to be like this. If it aint broke, why fix it?



NINTENDO

nintendo forever . . .

theprof00 on 16 June 2010
theARTIST0017 said:
theprof00 said:
theARTIST0017 said:
theprof00 said:
theARTIST0017 said:
theprof00 said:
RolStoppable said:

I just watched the Sorcery gameplay on youtube. So that's the game that makes people go "wow".

It didn't really "wow" me as much to say that right after watchin zelda, it seemed to have many of the same elements, but with a different setting, abilities, and tricks as well as puzzles and expandability.

The two seem very similar, and honestly I was very disappointed with zelda. I expected a lot more. Nothing has changed, and the presentation was nearly a disaster.

With sorcery, it feels like the kind of change zelda should have gotten. It's something different.


Ok dude. Whoah, lets go back to what you said. The kind of change Zelda should have gotten? WHAT?! Are you serious?! I bet you right now Socrcery wont be getting 9's when it come out. Zelda's presentation was a disaster? Why? Because of some technical difficulties note because the games is bad. Zelda > Sorcery IN EVERY WAY. Graphics, gameplay you name it bub.

So if you think Zelda should have gotten the kind of change similar to game like Sorcery, that would be a true disaster. Sorcery does not = Zelda.

I wouldn't want zelda to be like sorcery. I just would like something that isn't ocarina of time with a different artstyle.

OK THEN! So then why are you contradicting yourself?! FIRST you said its the kind of change Zelda should have gotten. THEN, you said you don't want Zelda to be like Sorcery. Come on man its beggining to sound like you're dragging up excuese becasuse Zelda had bad presentration. AND you wouldn't want Ocorina of Time with better graphics. 1. We don't know much about the game. 2. Ocorina of Time is the highest rated game of all time.

It only feels like excuses because you're being defensive.

the full quote was

"it Kind of feels like the change zelda should have gotten. It's something different"

I think you are interpreting it the wrong way. Or maybe I'm really just bad at conveying my points. But I think it's pretty clear. It doesn't say anything in there about wanting zelda to be like sorcery. It does say that Zelda should have been changed in a way that is equal to the difference between the two styles. IE, inasmuch as sorcery is different from zelda, zelda should have differentiated itself similarly from past zeldas.

Look at Legend of Zelda, Adventures of Link, Link to the past, Ocarina, Windwaker, four swords.

All very very different games. The last 5 zelda games? Ocarina, Majora, Wind waker, TP, and this one. 4 of them are almost carbon copies save for some graphical change or minor gameplay element.

Zelda deserves to do something different, and M is not that special to make a zelda feel unique.


Ok I understand that part. But still. No need to cast judgement and say Sorcery > Zelda: SS 

I'm in favor of Skyward Sword because I feel, this is the kind of game that most fans want, i mean as a Zelda fan myslef I know I want it to be like this. If it aint broke, why fix it?


I didn't. I said "Sorcery<Zelda?" with a question mark.

I know it will be good.



Around the Network
theARTIST0017 on 16 June 2010
theprof00 said:
theARTIST0017 said:
theprof00 said:
theARTIST0017 said:
theprof00 said:
theARTIST0017 said:
theprof00 said:
RolStoppable said:

I just watched the Sorcery gameplay on youtube. So that's the game that makes people go "wow".

It didn't really "wow" me as much to say that right after watchin zelda, it seemed to have many of the same elements, but with a different setting, abilities, and tricks as well as puzzles and expandability.

The two seem very similar, and honestly I was very disappointed with zelda. I expected a lot more. Nothing has changed, and the presentation was nearly a disaster.

With sorcery, it feels like the kind of change zelda should have gotten. It's something different.


Ok dude. Whoah, lets go back to what you said. The kind of change Zelda should have gotten? WHAT?! Are you serious?! I bet you right now Socrcery wont be getting 9's when it come out. Zelda's presentation was a disaster? Why? Because of some technical difficulties note because the games is bad. Zelda > Sorcery IN EVERY WAY. Graphics, gameplay you name it bub.

So if you think Zelda should have gotten the kind of change similar to game like Sorcery, that would be a true disaster. Sorcery does not = Zelda.

I wouldn't want zelda to be like sorcery. I just would like something that isn't ocarina of time with a different artstyle.

OK THEN! So then why are you contradicting yourself?! FIRST you said its the kind of change Zelda should have gotten. THEN, you said you don't want Zelda to be like Sorcery. Come on man its beggining to sound like you're dragging up excuese becasuse Zelda had bad presentration. AND you wouldn't want Ocorina of Time with better graphics. 1. We don't know much about the game. 2. Ocorina of Time is the highest rated game of all time.

It only feels like excuses because you're being defensive.

the full quote was

"it Kind of feels like the change zelda should have gotten. It's something different"

I think you are interpreting it the wrong way. Or maybe I'm really just bad at conveying my points. But I think it's pretty clear. It doesn't say anything in there about wanting zelda to be like sorcery. It does say that Zelda should have been changed in a way that is equal to the difference between the two styles. IE, inasmuch as sorcery is different from zelda, zelda should have differentiated itself similarly from past zeldas.

Look at Legend of Zelda, Adventures of Link, Link to the past, Ocarina, Windwaker, four swords.

All very very different games. The last 5 zelda games? Ocarina, Majora, Wind waker, TP, and this one. 4 of them are almost carbon copies save for some graphical change or minor gameplay element.

Zelda deserves to do something different, and M is not that special to make a zelda feel unique.


Ok I understand that part. But still. No need to cast judgement and say Sorcery > Zelda: SS 

I'm in favor of Skyward Sword because I feel, this is the kind of game that most fans want, i mean as a Zelda fan myslef I know I want it to be like this. If it aint broke, why fix it?


I didn't. I said "Sorcery<Zelda?" with a question mark.

I know it will be good.

besides the question mark look at the thread title. you have a >



NINTENDO

nintendo forever . . .

Xoj on 16 June 2010

actually i just talked some people, and it looks casual players game that stand out was sorcerer.

i think its a good g ame to promote the move.. if i ever find a video to see what they saw.

from i heard, they love the wii, but move 1-1 was way over the top. lets hope all market things if the same

but i think all new motion things will drop



Zlejedi on 16 June 2010

The controls part looked better in Sorcery but as a overall package I'd put my bet on Zelda being better game.



PROUD MEMBER OF THE PSP RPG FAN CLUB

Shadowfest3 on 16 June 2010

I'm not really a fan of Zelda.  However, I love Harry Potter and so Sorcery looked really awesome to me.



caz604 on 16 June 2010

As for presentations...

I agree, Sorcery was WAY better than Zelda.  The glitches really killed the presentations.

But come on, when finished product to finished product comes out, if there was only 1 choice, who can argue against Zelda?  Content wise, will Sorcery have anything that can compare to Zeldas storied environments?

I'd more compare Sorcery to Wii's Harry Potter games.  But it looks to be a killer app for the Move.  Should be awesome.



I game.  You game.  We game.

I'm a videogamer, not a fanboy, but have a special place for Nintendo.

Current Systems Owned: NSwitch/PS4/XONE/WiiU/3DS/2DS/PCGaming Rig-i7/ASUS i7 Gaming Laptop.

Previous Game Consoles:  PS3/Xbox360/Wii/DSL/Pretty much every one thats been released since the Atari 2600.