well then money should be made soon.
nightsurge said:
They are referring to the new unit which Sony announced to be able to make a profit during this time but wasn't much available until the last few weeks. |
no they weren't,SONY CFO said they were able to profit on the existing console under $10 for the JAN-MAR period.
the new RSX didn't even come into play in that period.
nightsurge said:
No they were not making profit on PS3 hardware at all until this new unit. Your info, Solid_Snake, is wrong. |
yes they were your info is wrong
nightsurge said:
They are referring to the new unit which Sony announced to be able to make a profit during this time but wasn't much available until the last few weeks. |
no they weren't.RSX weren't in production till April and were shipped nowhere.you really think if they were making profit then they would have shortages for GOD OF WAR launch.
nightsurge said:
No, actually business week is wrong as well. Not really wrong, per say, mostly just a misunderstanding exactly how you and Solid are misunderstanding. Sony informed everyone that the reason they had shortages was because they had been working on a new revision to the RSX. They said this revision would be able to cause profit. However, this revision did not hit shelves until the last few weeks, outside of the first quarter. So really what business week did was infer that Sony had gotten those new units out already when in fact they hadn't. Either that or the supply was so low it went unnoticed among the other models. Regardless, none of this matters because you and I are in agreement that it was the NEW MODEL with new RSX that was/is making a profit. I was simply arguing against Solid_Snake who claimed that the PS3 model from 2009 had been profitable at some point which it wasn't. |
no sony didn't start to ship the RSX and they didn't say why the shortages were for
we has shortages till the last week of MARCH and APRIL start too,heck the shortages are still there.they are supposed to ship the 40nm RSX in MAY
the CFO himself said they were able to profit from the existing models.I didn't mean it from the 2009 models,i meant they were able to make profit from other blu-ray,die,other things,etc according to the SONY CFO started making profit.
the 2009 models were sold out,why the hell would i mean those
drkohler said:
I don't think there is enough incentive to go below 40nm in the forseeable future. All these sub 40nm processes are very expensive and keeping high yield 40nm lines in operation makes more sense than investing huge amounts in smaller redesigns (an equally major undertaking) - which in the end would probably mean to save another $2 on the power supply. There is a reason why PC Southbridges are manufactured on "Stone-age" 110-130nm lines, it's simply not worth economically to go lower. Better invest your time and money into sub-30nm PS4 components. |
PS4 is atleast 2 years far and if SONY are to cut price on the PS3 then they will have to go for the smaller sizes
| czecherychestnut said: Everyone seems to be forgetting the GlobalFoundries will have a 32nm SOI process up and running by the end of this year. Only 32nm bulk was cancelled, and Cell is made on SOI, so that would be an obvious fit. Having said that, one limiting factor for Sony in regards to cutting the cost of the console is that all PS3's have hard drives. Thats a cost that doesn't really go down as it has a fairly fixed material cost. Sure, they keep getting bigger, but that doesn't make the smallest ones any cheaper. I can't ever see the PS3 getting down to $99 - $149 region like the PS2 for instance, no matter how small they make the chips. I predict that the PS3 will plateau at $199, which is a good price for a console anyway. And it'll end up with a 22nm Cell, and a 28nm RSX. Given that RSX is on bulk silicon and Cell is SOI, I doubt we will ever see a combined Cell/RSX chip like we did with EE+GS on PS2, as a redesign of RSX to work with Bulk (or vice versa) is a fairly major undertaking. |
PS3 would be $149 but it would take time for that and if they have to go for 10 years,they will have to
Wow, Solid, you quote like 4 of my posts and in every one you are still completely wrong.
Sony's CFO said they would be able to profit of off the NEW MODEL WITH NEW RSX by less than $10 per console sold.
Sony DID SAY why there were shortages which was because of the new model trying to get into production.
Seriously... you are completely wrong. If you think you're right why don't you find some links and articles to back up what you're saying? You won't find any...
| nightsurge said: Sony DID SAY why there were shortages which was because of the new model trying to get into production. |
And for n+1th time : Stop spreading this absolute nonsense. Sony had 13mio units manufactured according to regional forecasts for fy 2009. 13mio units were delivered into the regions and it so happens that America underestimated the demand. End of Story.
The mere idea that Sony stopped the manufacturing chain just to wait for the new RSX chips (or _any_ chip) to arrive is so stupid, electric sparks out of your keyboard should have zappped you when you typed that nonsense. Do you really think everybody would have just sat down and waited/gone to Hawaii just in case the chips would have been 2 weeks late?
And especially for you for the n+2nd time: Sony delivered exactly the amount of PS3s that were ordered for the fj. Not one unit more, not one unit less. And this idea may be completely foreign to you but in order to deliver those units, they ordered exactly the right amount of components to be able to deliver these orderd units.
Good Lord: What is so diffcult to understand in the concept that:
a) A company delivers exactly the amount of goods its subsidies ordered from it
b) A company makes sure that they actually have the components to build these units ?
PS: After weeks of no 120G units on shelves, Switzerland's shops are slowly filling with 120G units again. And guess what: Model CHK2004A, the "old" slim model...
its still not completely in stock.. gamestop and amazon are showing "sold out"
