I think, once MS/Sony released their waggle iteration. The reviewers would be forced to revised their review system to cater for casual games. (We'll see lots of melt down)

They can't ignore the games anymore because it's not made for them.

But I think that would probably take a year before everyone settle down.

What do you think?

I've never understood this conspiracy theory that video game reviewers have an agenda/bias against casual games. If you look at the Metacritic averages, most of Nintendo's casual games have received good scores, usually around the 80% mark. That may not be as high as the 95-100% that the likes of Mario Galaxy and Zelda Twilight Princess get, but surely that's fair enough. Would I give Wii Sports 95-100%? No, I wouldn't. Sure, most casual Wii games get awful scores, but that's because they're awful.

Finally! Someone who gets it!

Thank you sir.

http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/wii/justdance

Critics score: 48
Users score: 85

I would love it someone made a game called zombpartygames!

I think I'm in love with you.

Just because the users like it doesn't mean it a good game

WHAT! Are you saying that Miley Cyrus and the Jonas Brothers aren't incredibly talented and among the best in the world?! Clearly the audience have stated they are.