http://www.fridgemagnet.org.uk/toys/dave-met.php

Sums it up quite well for me.

How can you judge the Prime Minister when he hasn't done anything (good or bad) yet? Give it about three months then you can be sure of your opinion. He's been accused of being style over substance (like those posters), but opposition polticians can do NOTHING to prove they can get things done. Only now does he have the opportunity.

Personally, if he just implements most of the coalition agreement pledges and the UK economy grows/jobs are created at a competitive pace with the rest of the world, he'll be a far better prime minister than the last three or four.

I'm confused, no judgement about his ability to be prime minister has been made in this thread.

The link that was gave was a quote generator, making fun of when he says to something to the format of " I met a lady named Mrs 'X' the other day, and she said to me that 'Y' was causing problem 'Z'", which he said all through his campaign. I thought the link was funny.

that link is funny, theres another website (http://mydavidcameron.com/) where you can make your own conservative campaign posters (has some hilarious stuff on it)

When I clicked i was thinking JAMES camereon. darn.

I did see the content of the link. I thought the OP was trying to say Cameron was only out to win public opinion by saying statements of that kind, rather than do anything.

...

To be honest I'm just irritated by the BBC constantly bashing Cameron for the tiniest things at the moment, and giving Labour a stage to do it. The articles are written in a tone like the government is defending itself from some scandal, whereas really they haven't done anything to criticise yet.

Here are the main politics stories today:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8681624.stm <--- The 55% thing doesn't benefit Cameron at all, its purpose is to protect the Lib Dems from snap elections and to make the coalition more stable. It's not an erosion of political liberty like the article suggests.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8684173.stm <--- Why would anyone have to 'defend' going with the Conservatives now? Labour wasn't willing to concede enough and a five-party coalition was a lot less of an option.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8683310.stm <--- And did they bash Labour when they had the exact same number of women in the Cabinet (four)?

They also managed to find the very few Tories who don't like the coalition and interview them at length. Ignoring the majority of each party that either support the coalition or believe it's the only workable option for now (which it is).

There is no need to treat politics news as so adversarial now the election is over. And certainly not to have a constant stream of headline news criticising a goverment that has only just been formed and not been able to do anything yet. The BBC is now biased. I wish it wasn't.