NightAntilli said:
My general point is that her review is not objective. That review has the lowest score on Metacritic until now, out of 22 reviews.. That says something.. And the "I want to not like AW so I'm going to nit pick and find things to mark it down and make inappropriate and inaccurate comparisons" should be the difference between 83 and 86, but in this case, it's a 7 that probably should be an 8 compared to the other reviews. And she's also inconsistent. One moment saying it has "impressive visuals" and then in the conclusion saying it has "decent visuals". And as soon as you do that as a reviewer, I'll throw your credibility out the window, because you are contradicting yourself, and if you do it in your conclusion, it's obvious you used that to drag your score down to your pleasing. |
What I meant was if her 7 was an 8 then the Meta might be 86 not 83. I.e. one dumb review doesn't substantially affect the Metascore. And its influence will diminish with more reviews being posted. So sure, you make a probably valid point (I haven't read the offending review) at the micro level, but not really at the macro level. And when considering the Meta scores it's the macro level you're looking at.
“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell
"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."
Jimi Hendrix


















