By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - So guess what company is worst for the environment?

gorgepir on 27 November 2007

According to greenpeace it is nintendo

http://wii.ign.com/articles/837/837898p1.html

 I guess they should be more responsible and take back there products when the life is over.



Around the Network
super_etecoon on 27 November 2007

http://vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=10822&start=0#end



gorgepir on 27 November 2007

:(



CDiablo on 27 November 2007

Nintendo products dont really die, so why have a takeback option. I still have my original SNES, GC, 64, GB original and had a functioning NES up until it got stolen. All my old controllers work great(I had to replace the joysticks on my 64 controllers). I dont know what they could take back.

Either way this is kind of shocking to me.



Getting an XBOX One for me is like being in a bad relationship but staying together because we have kids. XBone we have 20000+ achievement points, 2+ years of XBL Gold and 20000+ MS points. I think its best we stay together if only for the MS points.

Nintendo Treehouse is what happens when a publisher is confident and proud of its games and doesn't need to show CGI lies for five minutes.

-Jim Sterling

TWRoO on 27 November 2007

You have to read the article Diablo, Nintendo just didn't release any information to Greenpeace, thus automatic zeros across all criteria....It was based on what materials they use in the chips inside electronics, now it could be Nintendo is as bad as MS in that they make things with the harmful materials (and like MS are refusing to find an alternating till 2011) wheras it could be they are better than Sony in that they use very few harmful materials (i don't think any of the 3 provide a give it back to recycle them option)

regardless of any of that, Nintendo products don't get thrown away for defectiveness very often, nor do they take as much power when they are in use.