By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Can Bungie Surpass God Of War 3 Using PS3? Sources Say _____

 

Can Bungie Surpass God Of War 3 Using PS3? Sources Say _____

bungie is going to pass it and then some 29 10.51%
 
its going to be close 13 4.71%
 
it could go both ways 31 11.23%
 
not even close gow3 is still the best 107 38.77%
 
its way to early to tell 96 34.78%
 
Total:276
nightsurge on 02 May 2010
BMaker11 said:
nightsurge said:
Torillian said:
nightsurge said:
So I love how all of the sudden Bungie is an elite, well respected, favorite developer to so many PS3 fans. (Skeeuk started this new trend I believe)

and as the counterpoint you have 360 fans who think that Bungie is magically going to become a worse developer because their publisher changed even though the development team remained exactly the same (Aion)

But that has nothing to do with being a 360 fan.  That has to do with knowing Activision and their as of late questionable practices.

PS3 fans on the other hand are doing a complete turn around.  Rather than Bungie just making some "overrated, generic shooter franchise on xbox" they are now some elite developer that will be pushing PS3 hardware to new bounds!  (even though all games will be multiplat, not PS3 exclusive to begin with and Bungie has not done any PS3 development yet whatsoever)

So...because Activision is the publisher, all of a sudden, Bungie will become shitty devs? I dunno...I've had a lot of fun with MW2, so apparently IW didn't turn retarded by having Activision as a publisher.

Also, you are completely bullshitting. There is no "complete turn around". I know I, for one, haven't said anything regarding the recent deal between Activision and Bungie, nor have I ever said that Bungie made a generic shooter. Now, I'm not going to talk them up, because I don't care *that* much for them, but is it so bad to ask if a developer can make a game that looks better than another? You're just trying to start a flamewar

I'm not trying to start anything.  Just pointing out the hypocrisy.  Also, if anything, the fact someone is posting this BS by hiphopgamer is starting a flamewar.

And no, that's not what I meant about Activision, nor is it what Aion probably meant.  We weren't saying that Activision would ruin the quality of Bungie's games, just that they may ruin Bungie as a developer overall.  They may somehow screw Bungie over like they did with IW.  Force strict timelines that cause the game to be rushed, force higher prices for DLCs than Bungie wants, eventually cause layoffs or something, who knows.

And I'm not bullshitting.  You can look around on here and find at least a few PS3 fans that would never dream of touching a Halo game (or at least downplaying them left and right) all of the sudden praising Bungie as a great developer to dominate on PS3.



Around the Network
Lostplanet22 on 02 May 2010

Halo was one of the best looking games graphic wise last gen especially Halo 2. Their was a lot of negative comments about Halo 3 graphics because people were expecting a game that would push the xbox 360's hardware like Halo CE and Halo 2 did with the Xbox. Sure if you are an Halo fan you know it is not because of the graphics.



 

Gnizmo on 02 May 2010
BMaker11 said:
ymeaga1n said:
LOL you posted hiphop gamer? Please tell me you did it as a joke to make us laugh...the article has no logic...bungie isn't a sony 1st party studio

So only 1st party studios can surpass GoW3 now? ok

Really though, why does no one like him? Sure, he's pro-PS3, but most of the time....he's right. I know there are haters out there...but seriously

Killzone 2 Superbowl ad, 1.1 million pre-orders for KZ2 in Europe alone, Bioshock 2 being a PS3 timed exclusive, GTA5 being a PS3 exclusive, and oh god I just don't care to go on. He makes shit up all the time. If he were right more often than wrong people wouldn't care. Makingmusic, an admitted PS3 fan, will lock threads started off of his rumors. The man has zero credibility, and buying into any of his rumors is little more than wishful thinking.

@Scoobes
To the best of my knowledge RE4 on the GC never used pre-rendered cut scenes. That is all in-game essentially. I know the PS2 version had to cut that back along with some other stuff, but not the original game. Bungie is not a graphical powerhouse dev studio. Halo 3 should show this pretty convincingly if nothing else. I don't see why thats an issue though. The games likely won't be the best looking games, but will be a blast for those that like the genre I am sure.



Starcraft 2 ID: Gnizmo 229

A Bad Clown on 02 May 2010
Gnizmo said:
BMaker11 said:
ymeaga1n said:
LOL you posted hiphop gamer? Please tell me you did it as a joke to make us laugh...the article has no logic...bungie isn't a sony 1st party studio

So only 1st party studios can surpass GoW3 now? ok

Really though, why does no one like him? Sure, he's pro-PS3, but most of the time....he's right. I know there are haters out there...but seriously

Killzone 2 Superbowl ad, 1.1 million pre-orders for KZ2 in Europe alone, Bioshock 2 being a PS3 timed exclusive, GTA5 being a PS3 exclusive, and oh god I just don't care to go on. He makes shit up all the time. If he were right more often than wrong people wouldn't care. Makingmusic, an admitted PS3 fan, will lock threads started off of his rumors. The man has zero credibility, and buying into any of his rumors is little more than wishful thinking.

@Scoobes
To the best of my knowledge RE4 on the GC never used pre-rendered cut scenes. That is all in-game essentially. I know the PS2 version had to cut that back along with some other stuff, but not the original game. Bungie is not a graphical powerhouse dev studio. Halo 3 should show this pretty convincingly if nothing else. I don't see why thats an issue though. The games likely won't be the best looking games, but will be a blast for those that like the genre I am sure.


Don't forget him saying the Splinter Cell Conviction demo was coming out in January! The only things I've ever seen him right about are things that someone else predicted and he bandwagoned it.



19:44:34 Skeezer METAL GEAR ONLINE
19:44:36 Skeezer FAILURE
19:44:51 ABadClown You're right!
19:44:55 ABadClown Hur hur hur
19:45:01 Skeezer i meant
19:45:04 Skeezer YOU ARE A FAILKURE
19:45:08 Skeezer FAILURE*
Lyrikalstylez on 02 May 2010

O-WoW, Before people complained Bungie werent a great developer and now fanboys are making wild allegations that the company is gonna make this amazing graphics for the ps3..........this is the biggest 2 face b.s. that I have ever seen!!!!!



Around the Network
Attoyou on 02 May 2010
kowenicki said:
Attoyou said:
Torillian said:
nightsurge said:
So I love how all of the sudden Bungie is an elite, well respected, favorite developer to so many PS3 fans. (Skeeuk started this new trend I believe)

and as the counterpoint you have 360 fans who think that Bungie is magically going to become a worse developer because their publisher changed even though the development team remained exactly the same (Aion)

Lol I have Even Seen 360 Fans Turning on Halo after the announcement, halo is Suddenly Terrible For a few.

So Really It Is not just The PS3 Fans With the Sudden Change of Heart.

 

 


show me a pro-halo 360 fan that is now knocking halo...

show me.

Sure, And You Show Me "Most PS3 Fans" Praising Bungie After Years Of Knocking them??

lol You want To Find a Halo Fan knocking Halo?  "All you need to do is open your eyes and read the forums...  there are plenty of examples."

TBH I Cant be Arsed

 



Atto Suggests...:

Book - Malazan Book of the Fallen series 

Game - Metro Last Light

TV - Deadwood

Music - Forest Swords 

Booh! on 02 May 2010
freebs2 said:
1337 Gamer said:
freebs2 said:
lol like bungie is an hardwere-pushing developer..... Halo in terms of graphics has never been that great.

Halo 2 easily the best looking game of last gen says Hi.

Really?

It  has hi-res textures but in terms of characters and eviroment complexity and animations it's pretty poor,also it doesn't run 60fps

Halo 2 (XBOX)-Bungie

 

Look at those arms and legs, looks almost like N64 model with better textures, all inside square shaped room.

Now let's see some Gamecube games.

Resident Evil 4

Metroid Prime 2

Rouge Squadron 3

There's no need to underline the hardwere differences beetween GC and XBO.... also all those games runs 60fps.

This meme is getting a bit annoying ("Halo is about gameplay, not graphics"). Halo and Halo 2 were both graphical showcase. I still remember all the hype for Halo: CE's graphics. However here's a little memory refresh:

ign.uk | Halo: CE |  presentation 10.0 - graphics 9.0  | -> http://uk.xbox.ign.com/articles/165/165922p2.html

ign.uk | Halo 2     |  presentation 9.5 - graphics 9.5   | -> http://uk.xbox.ign.com/articles/557/557509p8.html

 

P.S. the gamecube was a better machine than the xbox, so it's a bit mischievous to compare xbox games to gamecube ones.



freebs2 on 02 May 2010
Scoobes said:
freebs2 said:
1337 Gamer said:
freebs2 said:
lol like bungie is an hardwere-pushing developer..... Halo in terms of graphics has never been that great.

Halo 2 easily the best looking game of last gen says Hi.

Really?

It  has hi-res textures but in terms of characters and eviroment complexity and animations it's pretty poor,also it doesn't run 60fps

Halo 2 (XBOX)-Bungie

 

Look at those arms and legs, looks almost like N64 model with better textures, all inside square shaped room.

Now let's see some Gamecube games.

Resident Evil 4

Metroid Prime 2

Rouge Squadron 3

There's no need to underline the hardwere differences beetween GC and XBO.... also all those games runs 60fps.

Wow, another "cherry picking of screenshots" post. I especially like how the Res Evil 4 screenshots weren't during gameplay, yet the first Halo 2 shot was in game and a MP one at that.

I don't like the Halo games but credit where credit is due. It's pretty well established that Halo 2 was one of the more advanced (graphically) games on consoles last gen. I think it was the first console game to incorporate normal mapping and previously the only game to incorporate it was Far Cry on PC, and we all know how advanced Crytek are in visuals.

If I have to be precise the first picture of Re4 is not during gameplay, but it is rendered in real-time but the 2nd is, you can also see the life bar on the right-bottom corner, also both mp2 and rouge squadron screens are in real time.....not to mention that in still images halo is advantaged, you can't see in still images how animations are bad. Yes, halo2 may have normal maps, but as I said the enviroment and caharacters aren't more complex than an average ps2 game.



Booh! on 02 May 2010

Uh, I almost forgot to say: I voted "it's way to early to tell". (However I doubt that Bungie could do better)



fastyxx on 02 May 2010
TT Makaveli said:
freebs2 said:
lol like bungie is an hardwere-pushing developer..... Halo in terms of graphics has never been that great.

exactly...

You're letting your ignorance show in a large way here.

Graphics are not the only thing that push the limits and capacities of a system.  Bungie did things with Halo 2 on the original Xbox that most companies can't match yet.  

You know - good innovative games HAVE been made exclusively for non-Sony systems.  I know it's shocking.  But it IS ok to acknowledge it.  It will only hurt for a moment.  



Can't we all just get along and play our games in peace?