both when engadget had the motion controller and dr marks and anton where there they mentioned the effect 3d had when you move the move. I really want to see that. individually I would have to say move>3d

3d has 2 votes not doing so well.

I vote for 3d. Everyone already has motion (natal = full body and the wii has been supported for years). The next step is 3d. I want it to jump off the screen

It's not that I'm not hyped about 3D gaming...

It's that I don't have the cash to get all that is required to go 3D. I'm all for the tech to be pushed forward. But they are asking consumers to upgrade to 3D TVs only a few years after HD started its immersion in our houses.

They can't be serious when they ask us to buy a new $1500+ TV every few years when they release new standards!

Especially in the economic state our world is in.

Because of that, I must say I'm more hyped about the new motion gaming peripherals than I asm for 3D.

I want a kind of 3D multi-level minority report style setup for browsing, watching videos, looking at pictures and playing music. Using both the move and 3D. That'd be awesome.

motion sensing plus 3d.. how downgraded are the visuals going to become , i want motion sensing thats about it cause its a fairly small insignificant amount of power to use but not combined with 3d tech , i want the games to keep pushing visuals and physics and not keep adding these things that use up system resources.

if these 3d games become a standard they better be 2 versions of the game on the disc im not buying a 3d anytime soon years away from that

I put motion sensing cause I wanna see PS do things that the Wii hasent done yet. 3D isnt going to be very good this gen + Im not even sure my TV can do it.

Wtf 3D all the way, I am surprised that most of u said motion sensoring wtf

1. Motion Sensing is already available via Wii
2. 3d is already available via PC


Seeing how i have both already....I could care less.

Not at all. So far, nothing about either option has been very appealing.