wow, so UNimpressive

really...

I expected something amazing !

I think the videogame industry is already bigger than the movie industry

Raytracing is VERY impressive libellule. Prerendered it already is pretty impressive, but it is so (G|C)PU intensive that realtime raytracing is very limited. While this is not a very large or complex environment, the fact that the cell is capable of it at all [in realtime] is fairly impressive.

WASHIMUL, HUS WHO ARE U?

BUT, 2 points :

- they have to use 3 PS3 !!!!!!!!!
- the car is pretty but cars in GT5 look better.

Again, I m not impressed ... sorry.

Hilarious stuff again from people. That videos doing ray tracing which is extremely impressive. The Cell is actually excellent at lots of different sorts of graphics work. Some exclusive games are already using the Cell for some stuff. But mid to late 2008 is when we'l see major stuff.

You people talk big about raytracing but do you honestly think it will make a generational leap of visuals whenever we actually get a machine powerful enough to process it all in realtime ALONG with everything else it's gonna display.

Not impressive.

but what's the point? I don't mean to negate the cell's ability to render graphics (although there is no sign of improving them, sas leo psoted in the thread title), but it's obviously not a good idea to use spe to render graphics when you have to handle complex environments, AI and other crap. There is no to use an spe to render graphics when they have to do other duties, especially since nothing else will do it for them.

it might be bigger but more money can be made at the gaming market

 Well that statement is semi-false all on its own >_> Last time I checked Napolean Dynomite was for some awefull reason insanely huge, yet the ammount of money the put into it... was not >_>;;; Plus movies bank in on theaters AND disks. The "potential" to do so is there yes, but not every game, in fact, MOST games, won't sell like Halo 3 lol.