a better pc dont care for the 360 which a new pc would be better then the 360 and the ps3 costs as much as a pc
dick cheney loves me, he wants to take me hunting
mkwii code- 1977-0565-0049
a better pc dont care for the 360 which a new pc would be better then the 360 and the ps3 costs as much as a pc
dick cheney loves me, he wants to take me hunting
mkwii code- 1977-0565-0049
Definitely a 360. The current 360 exclusives are vastly superior, only 1 future PS3 exclusive interests me, and very few multiplats are better on one or the other. My first choice would still be a better PC though.
I'm going to end up with one more console before the end of the this gen, really it's a toss up for me. A year ago I would have said PS3, a few months ago I was leaning heavily towards 360...but now PS3 is fighting it again. In fact, I had a dream a couple od days ago that I bought a PS3.
I guess it's up to Star Ocean 4.
Tag - "No trolling on my watch!"

Just buy them all but wait for it.. I bought a Xbox and a GC at 05 they were damn cheap (people who bought a xbox on the launch spended more money for it than me who bought GC +Xbox +DC).

I dont think this generation though is gonna have such rapid price cuts
ssj12 said:
Nintendo always makes profit frist on their consoles. THe GC made them a profit day one, same with the 64 and SNES. Only console that hurt them was the Virtual Boy. lol what a failure. I dont really know who reported that but honestly I dont see why he is trolling. His statement is rather truthful. Sony might be the only company that has a chance of surpassing the Wii. With the PS3selling faster then the 360 first year Sony has a chance to win. |
People respond to the question with an answer he doesn't like so he says something to spark a reaction from people. Those that responded probably said 360 because they prefer it over the PS3 but instead of taking it at face value he says something just to piss off those people despite how absurd the claim is. The 360 is not only closer to the Wii numbers, but is also selling faster than the PS3. There is no proof that the 360 is any less of a threat than the PS3. The post was made just to get responses.
On topic, I would get a 360. It has a few games I would really like to play, and they will probably remain exclusive.
ssj12 said:
Nintendo always makes profit frist on their consoles. THe GC made them a profit day one, same with the 64 and SNES. Only console that hurt them was the Virtual Boy. lol what a failure. I dont really know who reported that but honestly I dont see why he is trolling. His statement is rather truthful. Sony might be the only company that has a chance of surpassing the Wii. With the PS3selling faster then the 360 first year Sony has a chance to win. |
I think it got reported for being completely deluded. Kind of like your reply.
Tag - "No trolling on my watch!"

Probably a 360.
Better price point.
More value.
More and better games (of the type that I like).
So long as I can avoid RROD.
Mike from Morgantown.
I am Mario.I like to jump around, and would lead a fairly serene and aimless existence if it weren't for my friends always getting into trouble. I love to help out, even when it puts me at risk. I seem to make friends with people who just can't stay out of trouble. Wii Friend Code: 1624 6601 1126 1492 NNID: Mike_INTV |
Torn on this one, I don't want a 360 because of hardware unreliability and they charge for online. However, it looks like PS3 may be the black sheep this generation and I wouldn't want to be getting all the poor versions of multi-system games or deal with GC like support later in 3 years.
Also, Mass Effect and GTA4 are the two games I really want to play but can't on Wii, nor PS3 for ME, and the extra content for GTA on 360 tilts that to it's favour too.
I really want the PS3 to make a real resurgence so I could justify getting that, but if I was to go out today, it'd have to be a 360. For now, I refuse to get either.