Rainbird said:
Xero said:
Rainbird said:
Xero said: There's about 3-4 90's which haven't been added to the Metascore.
Eurogamer are a joke. 3 independant reviews which conclude a 7 score? they're clearly coordinated, and shouldn't have separate entries on Metacritic.
|
They're not coordinated, that they all agree on the score is coincidence. Or should IGNs and IGN UKs 9s be put into one as well?
|
Sure.
|
Obviously they aren't different review sites, so you go tell these guys to shut down their different divisions and I'll tell metacritic that they need to limit how reviews they accept.
>_>
Eurogamer Spain and Eurogamer are two different entities, that they agree on the score is like saying that all the reviewers who give a game the same score should be rolled into review.
|
If you actually read through them they even bring up the exact same points, in the exact same order. In Eurogamers case lack of innovation isn't even something other reviewers are mentioning yet they hammer the same points across 3 'independent' reviews.
In this instance, specifically with Eurogamer. I'm just not buying it.
Usually with there other reviews, Eurogamer Portugal and Eurogamer Spain are exactly the same anyway.