Sorry I have to ask:

You assume that every PS3 or Bluray player has its own unique key no other PS3/Bluray player has ?

And if Sony blacklisted your individual key from your PS3 they gona put it on a blacklist and your PS3 key will be pressed on every single  new released disc ? 

I never heard of that and I was truly surprised first.  I googled a bit but I found literally nothing about a person who was blacklisted by sony and cant play new bluray releases. Then I read the link. (I should have read the link first)

Indeed I understood the wikipedia article in a totally different way. I cant make the connection between:

 "The Advanced Access Content System (AACS) is a standard for content distribution and digital rights management. It was developed by AS Licensing Administrator, LLC (AACS LA), a consortium that includes Disney, Intel, Microsoft, Panasonic, Warner Bros., IBM, Toshiba, andSony.

Since appearing in devices in 2006, several successful attacks have been made on the format. The first known attack relied on the trusted clientproblem. In addition, decryption keys have been extracted from a weakly protected player (WinDVD). Since keys can be revoked in newer releases,^[86] this is only a temporary attack, and new keys must continually be discovered in order to decrypt the latest discs. This cat-and-mouse game has gone through several cycles.

 "

And:

"Well its more or less if they blacklist your PS3's keys, it'll prevent you from playing any future BDs.. but whatever, you can still hug your otherOS."

This has nothing to do with the bluray player or the PS3 this has something to do with pirating bluray discs.

See those decryption keys are on the disc itself and in order to decrypt (and pirate) the disc you need those keys if you extract them you are able to copy the disc. They make new keys all the time and the pirates have to get them in order to copy the disc. This is the cat and mouse game There is no blacklist and your PS3 has not an individual Bluray key, so that Sony can put this single key on a blacklist and press it on all new bluray releases.  

To the CFW:

Sony made a mistake with the removal of Linux first because they will get in trouble atleast in some countries mainly EU and Australia. They probably hope nobody will sue them. In europe they would lose but the problem is it costs a lot to make lawsuite and it takes time and there is probably noone willing to sue Sony because of that. And Sony knows that.

I am not mad at them but I do understand if people are upset about it. You cant punish hundreds of thousend customers because someone said he hacked the PS3.

This "CFW" is not like an usual CFW. They havent deleted OOS Functionality yet they just disabled it. Geohot has switched it on again he has done it with using files of the old FW, this isnt a true CFW. Its not comparable to any CFW out there and can barely be called a CFW. Thats why he wrote my "custom firmware" and not my custom firmware.

If Sony takes out the whole functionality in the next FW everything is gone and we wont see a OOS FW a long time. Sony was playing it safe probably because they feared lawsuites so they wait some weeks or months too see peoples reactions, they will probably delete it completly nexttime if its not in the FW at all nobody can activate it. Unless you truly make a custom FW but thats a whole lot of work and will take some time maybe next year.

Thats why he said theoretically you could enable OOS on Slims too because they have also just the OtherOS switch on 

yeah you show them, if you really want to hurt them you could just buy a bunch of PS3s, since they lose money on each one.

i thought about that too since they lose 40 bucks per console, but that would just boost their sales numbers and make their stock go up... i'll stick with pre-owned

You just arent a hardcore rebel then,  supporting the pre-owned business can actually help Sony.  The people who sell their used game do so to buy new ones most of the time.  SO in turn you are helping that.

But anyway, down with the big corporations that provide these wonderful gaming experiences!!!!!!!  RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE

Actually if anything it's more a case of sending said corporations a message that we have no problem with them trying to maximise their profits and their own interests- they're corporations, that comes with the territory. However at the same time, consumers have rights which need to be repsected and countries have laws which must be adhered to if they are to business in them, and they can't just circumvent said laws and rights just because it doesn't fit into the quick and easy solution when trouble starts brewing.

Noone here who has complained about the removal of the otherOS has had a problem with Sony wanting to protect their own interests- the problem has been the way they went about it and the fact that that way completely flew in the face of both business ethics and consumer protection laws in various countries.