akuseru said:
I don't defend the PS2. I never even brought it into the discussion. All I know is that I still have my launch PS2 and play on it regularly. This easter I even had it on for over a week, on the floor, on a carpet. Talk about good piece of hardware ^^ The point is, the PS2 did not fail as much as 360. Since the 360 is the console with the highest failure rate, ever, it obviously had a higher failure rate than the PS2. I don't think MS wanted to do this (extend warranties), and if they could get away without doing it, they would. I believe they were "forced" to extend their warranty, or at least in my country they will have to replace it by law anyways. We got 5 year "warranty" on all electronics. |
The PS2 failure rate was high enough that a class action lawsuit was considered, I think that proves they had a case to be answered for but chose to shaft their customers over by not offering any free repairs or extended warranty. The problem the 360 had is it was a lot more expensive product when it failed than most PS2's were. You say its not anything to be praised that they offer the warranty, well it is because they're not obliged in ANY country in the world to provide a product that lasts longer than 1 year. I think you've misunderstood the difference between a retailers obligation and a manufacturers obligations, but thats easy done when people only learn a small portion regarding such matters of law.
You do not have a 5 year warranty on all electronics at all but I really cannot be bothered to correct your inaccuracy in that instance, assuming you're based in the EU then you need to understand first what a warranty is and second how no repair is guaranteed without legal action and even then can be dismissed. Please don't tell me you've been learning from the MikeB school of EU law, which is complete bullshit I'll add.









