| TheRealMafoo said: Obama isn't trying to make a world without Nukes, just an America without them. |
This is one of the MANY reasons I am getting the hell out of the USA.
PSN ID: KingFate_
| TheRealMafoo said: Obama isn't trying to make a world without Nukes, just an America without them. |
This is one of the MANY reasons I am getting the hell out of the USA.
PSN ID: KingFate_
| TheRealMafoo said: Obama isn't trying to make a world without Nukes, just an America without them. |
Lol, you guys must suck at screwing then. Can't even handle a country like Afghanistan? Or Vietnam? ;)
Too bad you can't use brute force on a country without being punished for it anymore.
You do know Russia handed over more nuclear weapons then USA right? You do know Obama isn't going to remove(or at least never succeed in doing so) all nuclear weapons right? He just made sure USA and Russia have equal "firepower".
And can you blame the world for hating the USA?
Just accept it, we Europeans accepted the fact that the rest of the world hates us a long time ago. And because most people in the USA are from European descend you get the double hate treatment.
| TheRealMafoo said: Obama isn't trying to make a world without Nukes, just an America without them. |
Dictator much?
That really is horrible, we shouldn't start attacking everyone and make them fear us.. that really is horrid..
why can't we all just live in peace? Why do innocent people have to die?

The world is a community after all. Building peace among nations is not all that different from building peace among people. The only issue is that you have no ultimate actor who can stop nations like the police can stop people, but you can build a system of both enduring security and of friendship
Pledging against nuclear retaliation for non-nuclear attacks (even if they were chemical/biological) makes a bit of sense. Obama is bound by nothing so he can renege that if he has to, but it makes us look good, anyone who tried a nonconventional attack anyway would still see the hammer of conventional power brought down upon them
Nuclear weapons need to remain, but strictly as a deterrent against other nuclear powers from using their own, but even then the threat of their indiscriminate use always lurks.

Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.
leo-j said:
Dictator much? That really is horrible, we shouldn't start attacking everyone and make them fear us.. that really is horrid..
why can't we all just live in peace? Why do innocent people have to die? |
The great questions of the day will not be settled by speeches or majority votes, but by blood and iron.
Samus Aran said:
The great questions of the day will not be settled by speeches or majority votes, but by blood and iron. |
I get what you mean

leo-j said:
Dictator much? That really is horrible, we shouldn't start attacking everyone and make them fear us.. that really is horrid..
why can't we all just live in peace? Why do innocent people have to die? |
We can't live in peace because we are human. Humans kill each other. The best way to make sure someone does not kill you, is to make sure they know if they do, you will kill them, and everyone one they care about, and every one they care about.
There is nothing wrong with projecting power. It's what you do with it that matters.
TheRealMafoo said:
We can't live in peace because we are human. Humans kill each other. The best way to make sure someone does not kill you, is to make sure they know if they do, you will kill them, and everyone one they care about, and every one they care about. There is nothing wrong with projecting power. It's what you do with it that matters. |
dam dude.. holy $hit.. what about those that don't care for killing and just want to live in peace?

leo-j said:
dam dude.. holy $hit.. what about those that don't care for killing and just want to live in peace? |
They get killed by the ones that do, unless you do something to make sure they don't.
TheRealMafoo said:
They get killed by the ones that do, unless you do something to make sure they don't. |
the world is corrupt
