By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - PC Discussion - WHICH WOULD YOU CHOOSE????

I guess a 100 core processor, thought is that a good graphics card?



 

   PROUD MEMBER OF THE PLAYSTATION 3 : RPG FAN CLUB

 

Around the Network

I WOULD CHOOSE THE GRAPHICS CARD OPTION! IT WOULD PLEASE ME!!



Multi Core Processor



gamers would naturally choose the GPU. No need for insane processor.



Mutedperson said:
Senlis said:
So I can choose either 50 graphics cards or an 100 core CPU? You do realize that you need a CPU and a graphics card for a computer to run right?.....right?

wrong and right?!?!?! ya all you need is a proc that can do both. The Ps3 was made without a video card and then later had one added due to the strain devs would have tring to fiqure it out. As for may answer i have two really. If ati would get there stream tech running better the 5970's due to the fact they can indeed run an os with the right drivers and the bandwith is far more insane than a cpu. If those drivers would never show well then the proc casue it can already do both.

The only problem with having one chip that does both is a CPU is not good at graphics and a GPU is not efficient doing the work a CPU does.  It is two different types of math.




 

Around the Network

Do I have to pay ?



fenderlove01 said:

So would you rather have a 100-core processor that could all the multi-tasking ever necessary or a system that you could somehow crossfire 50 ati 5970's for insane frame rates, and jaw dropping visuals. Rules: YOU MUST CHOOSE ONE.

To me this reads more like a MB that has room for 50 Xfire slots and doesnt necessarily come with said cards.

 

Both are equally useless with no software support.



Senlis said:
Mutedperson said:
Senlis said:
So I can choose either 50 graphics cards or an 100 core CPU? You do realize that you need a CPU and a graphics card for a computer to run right?.....right?

wrong and right?!?!?! ya all you need is a proc that can do both. The Ps3 was made without a video card and then later had one added due to the strain devs would have tring to fiqure it out. As for may answer i have two really. If ati would get there stream tech running better the 5970's due to the fact they can indeed run an os with the right drivers and the bandwith is far more insane than a cpu. If those drivers would never show well then the proc casue it can already do both.

The only problem with having one chip that does both is a CPU is not good at graphics and a GPU is not efficient doing the work a CPU does.  It is two different types of math.

Ya i know they arnt as specialized to do both, i never said they were. The only reason i posted was you said "You do realize that you need a CPU and a graphics card for a computer to run right?.....right?"................ and thats not right. No its not practical but not right at the same time. Nividia is working on their cards to make them run an os.



┌∩┐d[•̪●]b┌∩┐

Senlis said:
So I can choose either 50 graphics cards or an 100 core CPU? You do realize that you need a CPU and a graphics card for a computer to run right?.....right?


this is my answer to. why not have both and have a bad ass PC?



i'll take the graphic's card and get a cell procceer.