By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - PC Discussion - Unreal Tournament III Reviews

http://www.gamerankings.com/htmlpages2/928117.asp

 

  Game Informer
 
12/1/2007
9 out of 10
90.0%
 
11/20/2007
8 out of 10
80.0%
  PC Gamer UK
 
11/20/2007
89 out of 100
89.0%
 
11/19/2007
B
80.0%

So far seems good though not sure if they where expecting 90+ like gears.  Looks like crysis in terms of reviews will be better overral. 



Around the Network

so far good reviews but i was expecting a little more



elnino334 said:

http://www.gamerankings.com/htmlpages2/928117.asp

 

  Game Informer
 
12/1/2007
9 out of 10
90.0%
 
11/20/2007
8 out of 10
80.0%
  PC Gamer UK
 
11/20/2007
89 out of 100
89.0%
 
11/19/2007
B
80.0%

So far seems good though not sure if they where expecting 90+ like gears.  Looks like crysis in terms of reviews will be better overral. 


why,did you think this would beat crysis



Because it has been talked about having the bestest graphics ever though mainly because the previous unreals where really good I was hoping this would be even better. Crysis is a new IP so you just never know.

Unreal Tournament - PC
GameSpy 11/11/1999 94 out of 100 94.0%
GameSpot 12/9/1999 9.5 out of 10 95.0%
IGN 12/6/1999 9.6 out of 10 96.0%
PC Gamer 8/1/2000 90 out of 100 90.0%
Computer Gaming World -- 5 out of 5 100.0%
Eurogamer 1/1/1999 10 out of 10 100.0%
Gaming Age 9/5/2004 A- 90.0%
GameZone 12/18/1999 8.7 out of 10 87.0%
Games First! 12/21/1999 5 out of 5 100.0%
HonestGamers 12/10/2003 10 out of 10 100.0%

Unreal Tournament 2004 - PC
GameSpy 3/11/2004 5 out of 5 100.0%
GameSpot 3/16/2004 9.4 out of 10 94.0%
IGN 3/11/2004 9.4 out of 10 94.0%
Computer Gaming World 4/27/2004 5 out of 5 100.0%
GMR Magazine 6/1/2004 8 out of 10 80.0%
PC Gamer 6/1/2004 92 out of 100 92.0%
Game Informer 5/1/2004 9.5 out of 10 95.0%
Worth Playing 4/16/2004 9.4 out of 10 94.0%
Game Revolution 4/12/2004 A- 90.0%
GameZone 4/8/2004 9.5 out of 10 95.0%

By the way these are early and very few reviews so it might better.



reviewers suck at playing it seems... they cant handle the speed of the game. thats why they are giving B's. UTIII takes a bit of training to react in a second flat.



PC gaming is better than console gaming. Always.     We are Anonymous, We are Legion    Kick-ass interview   Great Flash Series Here    Anime Ratings     Make and Play Please
Amazing discussion about being wrong
Official VGChartz Folding@Home Team #109453
 
Around the Network

Ut3 is great, im loving it (demo). But seriously, just graphic wise, crysis is far superior.



Neos - "If I'm posting in this thread it's just for the lulz."
Tag by the one and only Fkusumot!


 

Yeah unreal has always been insanely fast paced. For me at least it was the best multiplayer game I played on the PC back when I used to play PC games.



I found UT3 to look a bit... grey, for some reason it didn't impress me as much as UT or UT2004 which I loved. I like the hover boards, they are pretty cool but the vehicles are a mixed bag.
I only played the demo for about 2 hours, so I'll give it more time before making a final judgement.

It's fast, but UT isn't quite as fast as Quake, but I think thats what makes it a bit more tactical



"..just keep on trying 'till you run out of cake"

Neos said:
Ut3 is great, im loving it (demo). But seriously, just graphic wise, crysis is far superior.

 Dead on. 

Crysis undoubtedly looks better graphically, but they are both a completely different experience as far as the multiplayer is concerned.

Both are excellent games, and I am sure I will pick up UT3 after the holidays.  But based on the demo which I have spent quite a bit of time with it should be a lot of fun.



To Each Man, Responsibility

I think the game looks good but I'm going to hold out on getting it for now. I plan no getting Gears of War first because I already have plenty of online multiplayer games like Quake and Battlefield.



PC Gamer