Xoj said:
more like made with some some 360 limitations in mind, one thing the game shouldn't linear, something that isn't a problem for the ps3 because of the huge space on blu ray. no need to swap disc (like SO4) to get to old maps. also towns and tons of sidequests maps were removed, and it's practically enough to make another game they said, u can't really not think it wasn't for the 360 version, development of all those maps should be at least a year of work, even if not finish they could have added it to the ps3 version it's they had the time, time used to port other version. what caused? the game it's betting hammered because of the lack of free roaming, even getting worse reviews than FF X-2.
|
The game isn't linear because of the 360. The game is linear because Square Enix doesn't have the talent to handle this gen. Their excuse of FF7 remake taking 10 years to make because of the towns and sidequests is laughable. FFXIII is linear because it would take "10 years". So how long did it take to make this game? 5 years? How long did it take to make 2 Mass Effects? 5 years? I'm seeing a problem with Square being able to cut it. It has nothing to do with the 360. Either way we 360 owners don't really mind because we have the much better RPG franchise this gen. Final Fantasy has been on a downslide for years.










