I think the biggest difference between the articles was the industry guy refering to Natal had some experience with some other programs aside from the original E3 demo. I did however find it extremely interesting that the camera ignored the person in the background, which brings into question how well multiplayer will work.

Well judging by the authers blog, and it's Wii/Nintendo way of blogging, this article/blog spot didn't surprise me..

While I have no doubt that these problems probably do exist, and some industry writers have been conditioned to report only the positives when previewing products (consider "journalists" who hyped games just weeks before giving them awful scores), I suspect that some of these problems will be resolved by the time the hardware launches.

I don't know why but I'm more interested in Move than I am Natal. We'll see how they both pan out as their respective launches near.

I thought that it was Wii HD?

^ If you're like me it's because of the potential for FPS and TPS games

That is now known as the the Sony PS3+Move

maybe, we will have to see how successful Move is first.

He's king of the fair-weather Wii fans. It's not bias, whatever it is.

I think some of what he said was common sense, it's natural that early efforts with Move are going to be inferior to current efforts on Wii, for the simple sake of the (what will be) 4 year head start.

why show stuff before they are ready? i don't see it as a good thing for them later on. well i don't care for them though as i am having fun :P