Funny how I've been in like six today and all of them were completely negative... either Sony has ripped off the Wii, Killzone 2's controls suck, Sony is gonna lose it's fans or Natal and Wii are the only competitors in the casual market. All have plenty of random trolling and some of the thread's have been created with trolling in mind. Once, again, it happens, you just pick the negative comments out more often than the positive or you take offense far to easily.

your getting the IDEA now!

that is exactly what i am talking about. you do know that's talking from their perspective because they programmed it right from the start on the playstation 3.

Its the same thing when cliffy B said "gear's would not work" on the PS3 they are not saying they could not make a game, what they are saying as the game stand's!

it's like you can make any game work on any machine, but IT may not be the same game across all platform's.

that's why there is

Multi-platform game engines

an

custom built Game Engine's

both are not saying anything that is not out of the relm of "the way they see it" that does not mean that someone else will agree with them.

it's all Opinion's based on their EXPERIENCE and skill .

John Carmack is very good, I respect him very much, just like Mike Acton i respect him very much, you will have both developer's that will give their Opinion's on what experiences they have had.

See how many of them get derailed compared to MS threads. You can't compare or maybe you're picking out the negative comments in sony threads and been too sensitive to it.

And I have been in many sony threads and they've been troll free.

Try proving I haven't.

I think it has more to do with the  tone of the thread's, many fan's from one side point toward "their bragging"

than the y start a thread" bragging" than

the thread's degenerate with back and forth from each side!

it's just that many thread's on this site have more PS3 poster's, threre are xbox360 fan's that post here, but both side's have people that post thread's that they know start trouble!

one side is just as much fault as the other.

"And I have been in many sony threads and they've been troll free."

because maybe your a good poster!

You're clutching at straws now. So you know when they said something it was from their point of view. So you'll be telling sony fanboys or even just fans when they say the PS3 is more powerful or God of War 3 can't run on the 360 it's just their opinion?

Didn't think so. Also whats your take on the God of War cant run on 360 comment? Is that opinion? because they passed it of as fact.

ALSO  I WASN'T QUESTIONING THE "MY POINT OF VIEW" COMMENT I WAS QUESTIONING PEOPLES RESPONSES TO IT AND THEIR COMPLETE REVERSAL IN ATTITUDES WHEN IT COMES TO SOMETHING A SONY DEV SAYS. LIKE YOU I KNOW NAUGHTY DOG ARE TALKING OUT OF THEIR ARSES. I AGREE WITH YOU COMPLETELY. Please don't use caps. It's rude.

I agree with all apart from the bolded. One side is clearly worse than the others. I would say that there are posters on all sides that sink to the same low level but one side has them in abundance. That alone makes their sides trollers worse and the point isn't who's the worst but why do 360 threads sink to such deprived levels it would make Soho look like Kensington and it is mostly because of one sides over abundance in these bridge dwellers.

I am offended. Are you saying a thread only descends to Roman party type debauchary because of me!!! And please don't use any of my post to prove your point

Maybe you're right

no I am saying your a pretty level headed person who post's here,

   I've owned something like 14 different systems since the 80s (NES, Genesis, SNES, N64, PSX, PS2, PS3, 360, Xbox, Dreamcast, Game boy, DS, PSP, iphone) and none of them made me shell out cash for basic functionality after I bought the system except for the MS consoles.  Technically Sega had seganet for the dreamcast, but that included being your ISP in the fee.  If the 360's gold included an internet connection service in the cost I'd be fine with it since it's value added not just charging me for something that should be included.

 It's that nickle and dime mentality that I dislike.  I would rather just pay 100 bucks more up front then pay a little less then get hit with hundreds in add on fees some perpetually.  If Microsoft cut that out next time around I would give their console a chance again (I've owned both a Xbox and 360 though sold both) I just don't know if it's in their DNA to deal with customers straight up like Nintendo and Sony do (well for the most part).

  I think a lot of the 360 negativity is from former 360 owners who had one issue or another with their console.  At 35 million sold I'm pretty sure almost every gamer on here has either had a 360 or had a friend whose 360 they've used.  It's not some irrational hate based on no experience.  Look me up on windows live/xbox live, same user name (Impulsivity).  I have over a 10k Gamerscore from when I played so you can't say I didn't give it a chance.

Seriously

Comments like that will lose you all your credibility :-