Funny how I've been in like six today and all of them were completely negative... either Sony has ripped off the Wii, Killzone 2's controls suck, Sony is gonna lose it's fans or Natal and Wii are the only competitors in the casual market. All have plenty of random trolling and some of the thread's have been created with trolling in mind. Once, again, it happens, you just pick the negative comments out more often than the positive or you take offense far to easily.

Wether people want to admit it or not does not really matter, but this website is well and truely pro-PS3. Think most people accept that.

For February the 360 did something that only happened once before in the history of video game consoles. It beat the Wii in sales. Was there a thread about that? Nope. Was there a news piece about it on front page? Nope.
If it was the other way around or the PS3 did it im sure it would of had its own news piece. Along with such classics as "This Prooves FFXIII is better on PS3". "GOWIII the greatest game of all time?" "GOW3 uses only 50% of its engine", "Sony to announce a huge new sequel tomorrow!", "Jump are about to announce a massive new game!" "PS3 to get a weight reduction!" etc etc.

Seriously look at the news archive and you will see the far majority of news is about the PS3. About 90% of that news not even worth reporting.

Now there is nothing wrong with that. Just i find it funny because this site is dominantly american. A place where the 360 has sold nearly double what the PS3 has sold. Is that 2 to 1 ratio reflected here? Not a chance.

umm ps3 beat wii on mgs4 launch..... and its not impresive at all when you know wii and ps3 have shortages


why isnt there negativity when a xbox fanboy makes a thread just to piss off ps3 fanboys

There is a thread about the 360 getting 1# in NPD, just not alot of people posting. Vg Chartz have different numbers than the NPD, why would they post something that goes against their sites info and most of the threads your referring to relating to PS3 are related to how it copied Wii and blah blah negative nonsense. I don't doubt that the site is PS3 dominated but the 360 crowd is pretty vocal when they want to be.

my marco thread got locked :

LOL, get interviews which state that the 360 is easier to develop for, something we've heard so many times now. Way to prove the 360 is more powerful. The scan is more valid because he directly stated the PS3 has more theoretical power.

That cheerleader uniform fits you very well, apparently.

  This is about 90% right.  It is partially true the 360 catches some flack because of Microsoft dislike, but it is also the way Microsoft acts with the 360. 

  I don't dislike Microsoft because I hate everything with Microsoft on the made by tag.  It is more or less that every time I think there is a product from them I kind of like they screw me.  I kind of liked Windows 7 until I found out they wanted 300 dollars for it (and the cheap version, the only one you can get in multi license packs, wouldn't have key features).  I kind of liked the 360 when I got it at launch until I needed Wifi (100 bucks) online play (50 bucks a year) a bigger hard drive since most of the 20GB is taken by default (100 plus)and rechargable batteries for the controllers (another 20 bucks).

 It's like when I just went to the Trump hotel in vegas and found out there would be an additional "resort fee" of 15 bucks per night per person required to stay on top of what they quoted as the room cost.  It isn't that I'm super mad they made the room 110 per night instead of 95 per night, I'd pay 110 for a 5 star hotel near the strip.  It's that they weren't up front about the value proposition and tried to tack on extras that should have been included in the base price (wifi, access to the pool and a bottle of water in the room, things you get for free at the 30 dollar residence inn, are what they say the 15 bucks per person resort fee provides). 

   I've owned something like 14 different systems since the 80s (NES, Genesis, SNES, N64, PSX, PS2, PS3, 360, Xbox, Dreamcast, Game boy, DS, PSP, iphone) and none of them made me shell out cash for basic functionality after I bought the system except for the MS consoles.  Technically Sega had seganet for the dreamcast, but that included being your ISP in the fee.  If the 360's gold included an internet connection service in the cost I'd be fine with it since it's value added not just charging me for something that should be included.

 It's that nickle and dime mentality that I dislike.  I would rather just pay 100 bucks more up front then pay a little less then get hit with hundreds in add on fees some perpetually.  If Microsoft cut that out next time around I would give their console a chance again (I've owned both a Xbox and 360 though sold both) I just don't know if it's in their DNA to deal with customers straight up like Nintendo and Sony do (well for the most part).

  I think a lot of the 360 negativity is from former 360 owners who had one issue or another with their console.  At 35 million sold I'm pretty sure almost every gamer on here has either had a 360 or had a friend whose 360 they've used.  It's not some irrational hate based on no experience.  Look me up on windows live/xbox live, same user name (Impulsivity).  I have over a 10k Gamerscore from when I played so you can't say I didn't give it a chance.

When anyone says something, it's from their perspective. I mean, as an example, Naughty Dog stated they are sure they wouldn't be able to run UC2 on the X360. They didn't say "from our point of view", but that does not mean that it is NOT from their point of view. They probably didn't even program for the X360 so how could they even know? If the whole "opinion" thing is your argument, you might as well throw ALL statements out the window because we can turn all of them into opinions.

your getting the IDEA now!

that is exactly what i am talking about. you do know that's talking from their perspective because they programmed it right from the start on the playstation 3.

Its the same thing when cliffy B said "gear's would not work" on the PS3 they are not saying they could not make a game, what they are saying as the game stand's!

it's like you can make any game work on any machine, but IT may not be the same game across all platform's.

that's why there is

Multi-platform game engines

an

custom built Game Engine's

both are not saying anything that is not out of the relm of "the way they see it" that does not mean that someone else will agree with them.

it's all Opinion's based on their EXPERIENCE and skill .

John Carmack is very good, I respect him very much, just like Mike Acton i respect him very much, you will have both developer's that will give their Opinion's on what experiences they have had.