no

you just have to make a claim supported by preview/review and not a bullshit free claim like some LOVE to do ...

I can say : technically : KZ2/U2 are superior to anything on 360 because it is widely accepted.

I could also put GoW3 on the podium near them.

so it is ok, everybody agree :

PS3 exclusive, whatever the reason, are superior technically to 360 exclusive.

thx for telling us what is knew since .... KZ2 release.

Generally accepted by the exact same crowd of sheeps.. I can argue easily that Alan Wake is more technically advanced than any console game yet (which I'm not going to do since I know how that will turn out -.- ), however, most people biased towards the PS3 will never accept this. Not because it's not true, but because of their ego and the need to brag about their system all the time. Another big mistake by you people is that better graphics equals a better technical game, which is not necessarily true. You still need to take scale, linearity, AI, number of enemies, sound effects, input delay etc into consideration.

Basically you're saying, if the majority agrees, then that's what we need to go on because that's the truth. Well guess what, the truth is not based on what most people believe. If the 99% of the world believed cows could fly, the 1% who agrees it can not, are still right. 

Technically? WTF does that mean in this context? The major difference is actually art, I.E. more with less than any major technical breakthroughs. Typically similar number of transistors clocked at similar speeds produce similar performance. Killzone 2 is a dark world with a lot of straight lines, good for showing off a technical masterpiece eh?

@NightAntilli and Twistedpixel,

you are not fighting agaisnt me, you are fighting against ... with whole internet.

@NightAntilli

YOU are the sheep man. Making free claim with the game not even close to be released with no reveiw to back up your point.
Not to say the game will be shit, but I doubt it will outcompete Uncharted2 and co technically.

Also, it is very funny that you come to me saying "technical achievement is different to visual achievement" because Alan Wake, that you are defending, is a linear game, with a small scale (as most games) ...

It never ceases to amaze me how the PS3 fanboys (or really any type of fanboy for that matter) yap yap yap about which game is technically superior like it's some sort of objective analysis/assessment when most of you have high school (or lower) education and very little if no formal education int he field of graphic design/computer programing/games development.

to my defense :

1/ I follow what the whole internet is saying and I REALLY never make claim base on my judgement on the technical part

2/ I still can (and I do) judge game artistically

3/ I usually bash free claim, and follow accepted claim that are linked to review

4/ I m playing HoMM3, STALKER, ZoTEnder, so, no, I m not a graphic whore ...

But if the PS3 is more powerful and 1 year younger, how come almost all next gen games run worse on it and how come games like Crysis 2 look a generation ahead of it's exclusives?

lol

Ok then

Graphics: Sixty frames per second of visuals as good or better than anything on the market

The visuals, voice acting, soundtrack, and direction are miles ahead of the competition

It's widely accepted that CoD: MW2 and Mass Effect supercede Uncharted 2, why can't PS3 beat middleware?

libellule: I didn't mean to single you out.  I am speaking about everyone who makes these claims.  Sorry if i offended you.

Farmville >>>>> PS3.