libellule said:
NightAntilli said:
libellule said:
celticlonewolf said: If you want to get what the op was was talking about take a look at most of the Allan Wake threads. The game by many reveiwers has been talked about as being very good to play and also a tech marvel with graphics up there as one of the best. To read some of the peoples posts in the forums you would beleive it has blah graphics with shity game play. Had the game been a sony only then the threads would have a much been much diff with maybe 1 or 2 bitter bad comments instead because its a 360 game 50 to 60% of the games talk is people talking smack about it or people pointing out how stupid the people talking smack are.
|
it is the typical problem we are mentioning
nobody is claiming Alan Wake sucks or has shitty gfx. But some people are claiming that alan Wake is the best piece of gfx around on console while the destructoid preview "only" syas that alan Wake gfx are superior to any 360 game and can only compete with the best PS3 exclusive. If people will not make bullshit claim/thread, then there will be no problem ...
|
That's the whole problem. Because here on VGC and other websites like GT etc, the only claim that is not bs is that the PS3 is better than the X360, and if you don't agree you're gonna get flamed.
|
no
you just have to make a claim supported by preview/review and not a bullshit free claim like some LOVE to do ...
I can say : technically : KZ2/U2 are superior to anything on 360 because it is widely accepted.
I could also put GoW3 on the podium near them.
|
Generally accepted by the exact same crowd of sheeps.. I can argue easily that Alan Wake is more technically advanced than any console game yet (which I'm not going to do since I know how that will turn out -.- ), however, most people biased towards the PS3 will never accept this. Not because it's not true, but because of their ego and the need to brag about their system all the time. Another big mistake by you people is that better graphics equals a better technical game, which is not necessarily true. You still need to take scale, linearity, AI, number of enemies, sound effects, input delay etc into consideration.
Basically you're saying, if the majority agrees, then that's what we need to go on because that's the truth. Well guess what, the truth is not based on what most people believe. If the 99% of the world believed cows could fly, the 1% who agrees it can not, are still right.