Well, Sony has only been copying the other two on this generation, at least we will have a Wii HD called Ps3.

I never said Natal is not revolutionary. My point was that it is strange that an un-release product get so much publicity and is claim innovation of the year. In person, if someone tells you something, do you answer with something not related to what he was saying? Now, if you want to tells me why you think theres so much publicity and hype for an un-release product I would be glad. I think that MS may pay or have good friends to receive this kind of threatment, thats my opinion, what yours?

EDIT: Wrong thread lol

nice MS PR if you ask me ... smoke and vapore right now IMO

This is always the last straw. MS paid them...

It is not like nobody has ever played this. This is not true, there were dozens of journalists playing Natal and the very most of them were amazed. I haven't seen anybody who actually played Natal and said it did not work.

I doubt MS paid time magazine (probably one of the most reliable magazines in the world), eurogamer, IGN, forbes, Jimmy Fallon etc.
And that was just the media. MS must have paid Hideo Kojima, Inafune and Nagoshi as well, because they loved Natal, too.

And while we are at it, they probably paid Sugar Ray Leonard, Eric Dickerson, Willie Gault, Paul Rodriguez, Brittany Snow, The Game etc. All of them played with Natal and liked it. Look for it at youtube.

Natal has not delivered YET, but it is the most promising peripheral I have ever seen. 

Wow, simply just wow, im not a MS hater, whats your problem? The first part where you give your opinion on why my thought is false is perfect but why talking nonsense before and after that. All this publicity doesnt make sense to me, hence why I think they either have good friends or that they are paying for it. I mean this happen all the time in publicity. Like for smallville, why yould they put Natal in there if MS didnt offer anything? Is smallville related to video games? and you cannot say that it is an attempt at representing the reality, it is not release yet. Same thing apply when you see some kids playing a PS3 in a movie not own by Sony.

Anyway its allright that you dont agree, but I never said they are paying everyone lol. Im sure that they didnt paid IGN to make an article on Natal because IGN is about video-games. Same thing apply to all video game magazine and journalist. But when its non video games related and they hype the thing like its god, then yes I wander why. Please calm down, its been 3 times you quote me, and each time its fill with sarcasm and your making me say things I didnt say. I hope you realize that I would be saying the exact same thing if it would be a reverse situation and its Sony product that would receive the same hype from non video game business.

E3 si coming up next we will know for sure by then. I think PS Arc is a better game controller, Natal "may" be a better UI.

If you look at the Natal demo they were spending more time on UI enhancements then actual playing. Voice control, remote flicking etc. would be good UI enhancements that would help sell natal but as a gaming controller I doubt I would want one.

i think sony should realy advertise more that they where the once who started useing camera tecnoligy first that way it will make ntal look like its just another gimmic

as because in my opinion the ps3's motion controlers is practiucaly a more advanced vertion of the wiimote which is a realy good thing to be honest because then u get wii gameplay and ps3 graphics :)

just in case people don't know there are even more rumors about the wireless nunchuck device lol, yay instant success guaranteed!! (on my part anyways lol)