By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Icyedge on 23 February 2010
Edit Thread
DirtyP2002 said:
Icyedge said:
DirtyP2002 said:
Icyedge said:
 

My point was that it is strange to see so much publicity on an unfinish product that we know almost nothing of. The wand is far from being publicize as much as Natal. You dont find that funny to see an unrelease tech in a TV episode or being called innovation of the year. How did they know? Im not too sure why you were asking my point in the manner you did tho. I wasnt saying wand is better or anything.

Because that is what this thread is about.

You might like this one:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W81PeswSWP0

Natal is revolutionary in every single way.

I never said Natal is not revolutionary. My point was that it is strange that an un-release product get so much publicity and is claim innovation of the year. In person, if someone tells you something, do you answer with something not related to what he was saying? Now, if you want to tells me why you think theres so much publicity and hype for an un-release product I would be glad. I think that MS may pay or have good friends to receive this kind of threatment, thats my opinion, what yours?

This is always the last straw. MS paid them...

It is not like nobody has ever played this. This is not true, there were dozens of journalists playing Natal and the very most of them were amazed. I haven't seen anybody who actually played Natal and said it did not work.

I doubt MS paid time magazine (probably one of the most reliable magazines in the world), eurogamer, IGN, forbes, Jimmy Fallon etc.
And that was just the media. MS must have paid Hideo Kojima, Inafune and Nagoshi as well, because they loved Natal, too.

And while we are at it, they probably paid Sugar Ray Leonard, Eric Dickerson, Willie Gault, Paul Rodriguez, Brittany Snow, The Game etc. All of them played with Natal and liked it. Look for it at youtube.

Natal has not delivered YET, but it is the most promising peripheral I have ever seen. 

 

Wow, simply just wow, im not a MS hater, whats your problem? The first part where you give your opinion on why my thought is false is perfect but why talking nonsense before and after that. All this publicity doesnt make sense to me, hence why I think they either have good friends or that they are paying for it. I mean this happen all the time in publicity. Like for smallville, why yould they put Natal in there if MS didnt offer anything? Is smallville related to video games? and you cannot say that it is an attempt at representing the reality, it is not release yet. Same thing apply when you see some kids playing a PS3 in a movie not own by Sony.

Anyway its allright that you dont agree, but I never said they are paying everyone lol. Im sure that they didnt paid IGN to make an article on Natal because IGN is about video-games. Same thing apply to all video game magazine and journalist. But when its non video games related and they hype the thing like its god, then yes I wander why. Please calm down, its been 3 times you quote me, and each time its fill with sarcasm and your making me say things I didnt say. I hope you realize that I would be saying the exact same thing if it would be a reverse situation and its Sony product that would receive the same hype from non video game business.