I don't see how either game, especially CoD is realistic. Bad Company is "common sense" realistic. That is, tanks don't take damage from bullets, you can blow up buildings, etc.

If you're looking for intensity and chaos, but in a controlled and smart gameplay, Bad Company 2 will satsify that. There aren't any lasers, aliens, or super high jumps, but there's plenty of chaos and explosions. Demolish your first building before saying that Bad Company 2 is boring.

I tried the demo...and its the same thing as COD. Its all about cutting down angles, walls, crouching, cover...

I played the demo for 15 mins and said... no thanks. Ill stick to acradey and crazy ones like Left 4 Dead, Team fortress, Halo and AVP which is currently spinning in my 360.

Your still talking shit? LOL.... Wow i was done with this hole non sense.

and for all i know metro 2033 could have awful controls, impossible SP. Making it much worse than BAD company 2. 

Im gonna rent both for achievements none the less.

So you're forcing yourself to play games you don't like? That seems completely counter productive. You're supposed to be getting enjoyment out of playing video games, not playing it like it was some chore.

And I'm not done with this hole non sense if you're going to spout falsities about a game that you haven't learned how to play properly, and blaming EA for something that's not their fault.

While cover is an essential part of the gameplay, DICE avoids campfests like other realsitic shooters by making all their game modes objective based, and by having destructible environments force players to constantly be on the move (since if you're camping in a corner, I can blow up those walls, or if you take cover under a window, I can simply destroy that portion.)

Please watch my gameplay video. Skip the tank momments since that'll be things not suited for your taste, but esepcially watch parts like 5:00 or 10:57. Those are the momments that I truly love this game (well, second to playing with friends).

I'll be getting BC2 for sure. I really don't know enough about Metro 2033. it looks cool and some of the ideas behind it are neat (having to use a wristwatch to check how long you have before you gas mask runs out instead of a HUD) but I don't know if/when I'll get itt.

im getting metro 2033

I'll probably grab Metro 2033 when It's a lot cheaper. It's just SP right? If it has Bioshock 1 levels of awesomeness then it might be worth $50 just for SP alone, but for me It's hard to plop down $60 on a SP only FPS. It should have at the very least some throw away MP to extend It's bang for a buck.

Bioshock is still the only FPS on the 360 that I felt was worth $60 for the SP campaign alone. The second one isn't bad but It's more of the same without the epic plot twists.

why did he get banned he just said he was tired of realilistic shooters which i am as well. ive owned graw1,2,cod2,3,4,5,6,RB6V1,2,BF:BC1. im really done with those types of shooters for a couple years. and metro 2033 is a breath of fresh air as was avp

Earning Achievements/Trophies is productive. SP in games isnt fun anyways. I play games for Achievements/Trophies. 

I know how to play BAD company 2.

I have no idea what the hell you are talking about. The only thing i blamed on EA/DICE is the shitty servers in BF43.