mrstickball said:
Honestly, I think its the other way around. Epic is one of the most under-rated. Not because of their games, which are good but not great in terms of frequency. However, their Unreal Engine is what makes Epic a must-have for Microsoft. Imagine a world where Microsoft gives out Unreal Engine as part of a SDK for free to developers. Could you imagine MS aquiring new developers by giving it in turn for exclusivity or a greater cut of royalties? MS would do insane business by that, and could screw Sony over in the process. |
I actually think MS will lose developers. The reason why the Unreal Engine is so popular (other than that it's a great engine), is because Epic puts no restrictions on the developers in how they use the engine and because they only ask for 25% royalty in return, which is ridiculously generous to the devs. Can you imagine MS asking for anything less than 75% in return? MS has never been known for their willingness to share their proprietary tools to begin with. And if they're going to share it, you'll know they'll charge an arm and a leg and they'll probably prohibit the devs from making multi-plat games. A lot of the major devs will just say no thanks to that. They'll rather look elsewhere or develop their own in-house engine if MS is going to force them to only make games for them and up the royalty cost on top of that.