By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Website Topics - VGchartz review scores pattern?

 

VGchartz review scores pattern?

There is no pattern, you imagining things. 20 30.30%
 
I came to the same conclusion! 11 16.67%
 
Conspiracy! I blindly agree! 15 22.73%
 
Coincidence! There is nothing more to it. 5 7.58%
 
Humans always try to find patterns everywhere 12 18.18%
 
I shall conduct a scienti... 3 4.55%
 
Total:66

You're poll makes this look like a joke thread.




              

Around the Network

their is no pattern I can 1000% guarantee that



Have you guys seen our Gears of War review? An atrocious affront to the need to adhere to the Metacritic party line



Machina said:

It's not a case of the site being biased - there's no way you could orchestrate such a bias amongst 16 different people (that's roughly how many active reviewers we have at any one time) and 5 different content editors. It's my view that the scoring differences are less about console preference, and more about how harsh or lenient the reviewer who happens to review a particular game (and own a particular console) is.

While I agree with your post, this point can be applied to nearly every review site out there - and even more so to an aggregate review site like Metacritic. That doesn't stop a huge number of forum posters from believing in a vast conspiracy of bias against their console of choice.



Who cares about Vgchartz review score??I don't. If you are interested about the game,just read the review.



 

 

Take my love, take my land..

Around the Network

this is definitely a conspiracy to me but i need proof to prove it.



Owner of PS1/PSOne , PS2 phat/slim  , PS3 phat/slim , PS Eye+Move and PSP phat/slim/brite/go (Sony)

The Official PS Vita Thread! Get all your latest PS Vita news here! Come join us!

 


the difference is little... but anyways, I tend to think that reviews are pro HD and anti Wii, so a little "adjustment" as you pointed is probably closer to what the scores should really be.



OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO

I don't think there's a pattern as in deliberate pattern. I think that the PS3/360 reviewers occasionally skew harsher than the general trend represented by Metacritic (in a flawed sort of way) while occasionally the Wii reviwers skew a little higher.

Now, assuming VG is using reviewers familiar with the platform this actually makes sense to me as I believe that:

a - general PS3/360 reviews tend to skew a little high generally, particularly for titles with official mag reviews, therefore I would expect a good, firm review to be a little lower than metacritic

b - general Wii reviews often seem to be by people who don't necessarily fully 'get' the platform or its titles, hence I'd expect a good, firm Wii review by someone who does to skew a little higher than metacritic.

Of course, maybe VG Wii reviwers are just big softies and the PS3/360 reviewers are all tough cookies.

Either way it's all a statistical accident. Probably. That was a slight joke.



Try to be reasonable... its easier than you think...

i do think VGCz scores games a bit lower than i think is right... don't think is a conspiracy... its just way of living... like a person who is usual to be in a bad mood and don't get excited so often...



Proudest Platinums - BF: Bad Company, Killzone 2 , Battlefield 3 and GTA4

Did anyone read Machinas post....?



CURRENTLY PLAYING:  Warframe, Witcher 2