i don't think  7 year olds have money to buy games, or even have the knowledge to distinguish a good and a bad game.

Yeah, it was an amazing experience. It handled the best gameplay so far, gorgeous graphics and awesome soundtrack. In fact, we all know that Mario Galaxy is easily surpassed in graphics, but it is hard, nearly impossible, to find something like a good old Mario gameplay experience. The soundtrack is very unique too. There's a lot of games out there that features great orchestrated music, but some are kinda generic. Generic music.

Anyway, it deserves its score. An addictive game. Though there are many great games out there. What I could say is that it is the only game this generation I felt I was playing like a good SNES or N64 game. It's like a game from another time.

I liked the game, biut not the best of wii for me:
tp > nsmbwii > sh: sm > smg
And that doesn't even count ds games

He said this gen. It is number five but all the games in front of it are from last gen.

i think it was good enough, but i didn't found it ground breaking since many new things were on R&C before.

I haven't played all the way through, maybe 5 hours in or so? It was okay.

Seriously, it is.

metroid prime and super paper mario are betta dan mario galaxy in my opinion , so much funner

The Call of Duty's on the hardest difficulty are pretty dam hard, don't think I've played many other shooters though. Oh oh Bioshock, which was sort of hard until you had levelled up crazy. 

 Galaxy really wasn't very hard though, definitely a step backwards from Galaxy and 64 in terms of challenge. Think there were only three stars I ever felt I had to 'earn'.

For the record, its not the first party games that people complain about.