theprof00 said: died only twice in 2 hours? No one is impressed or convinced by this bullshit. |
I beat the game in 34 hours on my first play through. I died 31 times total. So a little less than once per hour. And I didn't use a strategy guide.
theprof00 said: died only twice in 2 hours? No one is impressed or convinced by this bullshit. |
I beat the game in 34 hours on my first play through. I died 31 times total. So a little less than once per hour. And I didn't use a strategy guide.
bugrimmar said:
i'm using a strategy guide. happy? |
strategy guide? On the first play? Cowards die in shame!
PS: You should find a better strategy guide. Anyone who has played the game would tell you not to attack the red knight on your first time.
i beat it in hard nothing wrong with the game also it the best game i played in 2009 .. i think you lose the hope to beat the game thats why you hate it now.
Rpruett said:
I beat the game in 34 hours on my first play through. I died 31 times total. So a little less than once per hour. And I didn't use a strategy guide. |
sugoi monogatari aniki
|
See but what is wrong with that is you didn't even play into the game yet. Once you beat the Tower Knight (The boss immediately after the blue-eye guys) you start to feel the hitch of the game. You start to feel the 'rush' of the game. I mean three deaths and you quit? You didn't even play any tangible amount of time into the game to talk about repetition, IMO that's just crazy and illogical. Dying/Losing in ANY video game on the planet is repetitive and annoying. Why it bothered you in this one I don't know?
theprof00 said:
strategy guide? On the first play? Cowards die in shame!
PS: You should find a better strategy guide. Anyone who has played the game would tell you not to attack the red knight on your first time. |
i took up the strategy guide after losing to the red knight. and i realized i need the thing because there are tricks like that which sprout up out of nowhere and kill you. see, after the first time i died, i realized the cost of dying. "I have to repeat that all over again?" and i didn't want that to happen again ever. so i took the guide, but i don't look at it like every second. i only look at it when i'm feeling ominous about something or i don't know where to go next.
NNN2004 said: i beat it in hard nothing wrong with the game also it the best game i played in 2009 .. i think you lose the hope to beat the game thats why you hate it now. |
new game+ you meant?
bugrimmar said:
i took up the strategy guide after losing to the red knight. and i realized i need the thing because there are tricks like that which sprout up out of nowhere and kill you. see, after the first time i died, i realized the cost of dying. "I have to repeat that all over again?" and i didn't want that to happen again ever. so i took the guide, but i don't look at it like every second. i only look at it when i'm feeling ominous about something or i don't know where to go next. |
The game is about learning. You learned not to rush into battle with something that looks like potential death. Had you explored better, you would have nabbed the shortcut and literally had to run through maybe 15 enemies to get right back to the Red Eye guy that you died.
bugrimmar said:
i took up the strategy guide after losing to the red knight. and i realized i need the thing because there are tricks like that which sprout up out of nowhere and kill you. see, after the first time i died, i realized the cost of dying. "I have to repeat that all over again?" and i didn't want that to happen again ever. so i took the guide, but i don't look at it like every second. i only look at it when i'm feeling ominous about something or i don't know where to go next. |
my only problem with your whole argument is that you're using a strategy guide. By doing that, you have removed every single bit of tension and excitement and fear from the game. You know everything that is going to happen before it happens, and you are most likely reading the guide after every room or two to make sure you're not missing anything. You are injecting a strategy guide into the game. There is something wrong with your playing, man. It's a difficult concept to visualize, but you are taking yourself out of the game instead of experiencing it. At this point though, you've just about ruined the game for yourself. Basically you are reading a screenplay during a movie and pausing to read everyone's lines before they are spoken.
theprof00 said:
my only problem with your whole argument is that you're using a strategy guide. By doing that, you have removed every single bit of tension and excitement and fear from the game. You know everything that is going to happen before it happens, and you are most likely reading the guide after every room or two to make sure you're not missing anything. You are injecting a strategy guide into the game. There is something wrong with your playing, man. It's a difficult concept to visualize, but you are taking yourself out of the game instead of experiencing it. At this point though, you've just about ruined the game for yourself. Basically you are reading a screenplay during a movie and pausing to read everyone's lines before they are spoken. |
I use a strategy guide for JRPGs as I play them as well (if you wanna call this one or not, I dunno) to make sure I don't miss stuff and because I don't see the point in dying numerous times in boss fights. It's great that you don't feel the need to use them, but to give him a lecture and act like he's broken some fundamental rule of playing video games by using a strategy guide is just wrong.