By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Killzone 2 or Halo 3?

 

Killzone 2 or Halo 3?

Killzone 2 221 54.17%
 
Halo 3 187 45.83%
 
Total:408
Hisiru said:
letsdance said:
Hisiru said:
letsdance said:
Hisiru said:
XxXProphecyXxX said:
Hisiru said:
The results are expected if we keep in mind the fanbase here.

Yeh because evry1 shud pick halo 3 and ppl who liked KZ2 better automatically considered a sony fanboy, I alrdy said polls like this are not a gr8 idea because fanboys will pick the exclusive game for their beloved console I suggest you stop taking this seriously too, crying over a certain fanbase for picking the game exclusively for their console because your favourite game isnt being hailed by evry1 doesn't make you any better than this "group of fanboys" you whine about.

No, I am not talking about the quality of both games, I am saying that every poll "x360 x PS3" the PS3 will be the winner even if it's something like "which one has the best WRPG? PS3 or x360?", everyone will vote for the PS3 even if the x360 has Mass Effect 1 & 2.


I think this poll proves that theory wrong. Everyone likes to whine about how the Ps3 fanbase greatly out numbers the 360 fanbase yet the numbers are practically 50/50... and me having 4 votes a day

You can make a poll saying "which console has the best WRPG?" (or something obvious), so you can see if I am wrong.


And a lot of people would think of Demons Souls. I'm sorry you dont think so but to me Demons Souls > ME. I like medieval settings more than roided space marine settings

Very well. Make a poll saying "which console is at the 2° position in sales behind the Wii?". Let's see if there is no biased opinion in the polls.

 

 


And yet... the ps3 is selling very well at a higher price. I mean Sony is only 5.18 million behind MS in shipped numbers. That means the Ps3 has outsold the 360 by 1.5 million since its launch. Again... stupid poll



Around the Network

Both seem good games to me.

But Killzone 2 feels far meatier to me. Halo 3 sports a short repetitive campaign, so the online is very important, but you and your gaming friends need to pay extra to play online together and Killzone 2's online feels more interesting to me.

IMO graphically Killzone 2 wins hands down with its greatly animated bloody varied death sequences and better lighting. Halo 3 feels a lot like earlier Halo games and Killzone 2 far more unique and Halo 3 feels more like a game geared toward teens.

So Killzone 2 easily for me.



Naughty Dog: "At Naughty Dog, we're pretty sure we should be able to see leaps between games on the PS3 that are even bigger than they were on the PS2."

PS3 vs 360 sales

letsdance said:
Hisiru said:
letsdance said:
Hisiru said:
letsdance said:
Hisiru said:
XxXProphecyXxX said:
Hisiru said:
The results are expected if we keep in mind the fanbase here.

Yeh because evry1 shud pick halo 3 and ppl who liked KZ2 better automatically considered a sony fanboy, I alrdy said polls like this are not a gr8 idea because fanboys will pick the exclusive game for their beloved console I suggest you stop taking this seriously too, crying over a certain fanbase for picking the game exclusively for their console because your favourite game isnt being hailed by evry1 doesn't make you any better than this "group of fanboys" you whine about.

No, I am not talking about the quality of both games, I am saying that every poll "x360 x PS3" the PS3 will be the winner even if it's something like "which one has the best WRPG? PS3 or x360?", everyone will vote for the PS3 even if the x360 has Mass Effect 1 & 2.


I think this poll proves that theory wrong. Everyone likes to whine about how the Ps3 fanbase greatly out numbers the 360 fanbase yet the numbers are practically 50/50... and me having 4 votes a day

You can make a poll saying "which console has the best WRPG?" (or something obvious), so you can see if I am wrong.


And a lot of people would think of Demons Souls. I'm sorry you dont think so but to me Demons Souls > ME. I like medieval settings more than roided space marine settings

Very well. Make a poll saying "which console is at the 2° position in sales behind the Wii?". Let's see if there is no biased opinion in the polls.

 

 


And yet... the ps3 is selling very well at a higher price. I mean Sony is only 5.18 million behind MS in shipped numbers. That means the Ps3 has outsold the 360 by 1.5 million since its launch. Again... stupid poll

The x360 is at the second position (total sales) no matter how well/bad it's selling right now. Just make the poll and let's see what happens.



MikeB said:
Both seem good games to me.

But Killzone 2 feels far meatier to me. Halo 3 sports a short repetitive campaign, so the online is very important, but you and your gaming friends need to pay extra to play online together and Killzone 2's online feels more interesting to me.

IMO graphically Killzone 2 wins hands down with its greatly animated bloody varied death sequences and better lighting. Halo 3 feels a lot like earlier Halo games and Killzone 2 far more unique and Halo 3 feels more like a game geared toward teens.

So Killzone 2 easily for me.

And I should mention Killzone 2's 7.1 surround audio is so awesome!



Naughty Dog: "At Naughty Dog, we're pretty sure we should be able to see leaps between games on the PS3 that are even bigger than they were on the PS2."

PS3 vs 360 sales

MikeB said:
MikeB said:
Both seem good games to me.

But Killzone 2 feels far meatier to me. Halo 3 sports a short repetitive campaign, so the online is very important, but you and your gaming friends need to pay extra to play online together and Killzone 2's online feels more interesting to me.

IMO graphically Killzone 2 wins hands down with its greatly animated bloody varied death sequences and better lighting. Halo 3 feels a lot like earlier Halo games and Killzone 2 far more unique and Halo 3 feels more like a game geared toward teens.

So Killzone 2 easily for me.

And I should mention Killzone 2's 7.1 surround audio is so awesome!

KZ2 is for more mature gamers on the whole where as halo (well just look at the highlight) it obviuos when you play halo 3 multiplayer, you can hear the annoying screams and shouts of little children.



Around the Network
RareglovE said:
MikeB said:
MikeB said:
Both seem good games to me.

But Killzone 2 feels far meatier to me. Halo 3 sports a short repetitive campaign, so the online is very important, but you and your gaming friends need to pay extra to play online together and Killzone 2's online feels more interesting to me.

IMO graphically Killzone 2 wins hands down with its greatly animated bloody varied death sequences and better lighting. Halo 3 feels a lot like earlier Halo games and Killzone 2 far more unique and Halo 3 feels more like a game geared toward teens.

So Killzone 2 easily for me.

And I should mention Killzone 2's 7.1 surround audio is so awesome!

KZ2 is for more mature gamers on the whole where as halo (well just look at the highlight) it obviuos when you play halo 3 multiplayer, you can hear the annoying screams and shouts of little children.

Well...

What did you said?



Why would Halo 3 be better than Kill Zone 2? I think I already played Halo 3? Wasn't that the one on the original Xbox?


In all seriousness, Halo is stale in my opinion. The game is fun no doubt but it's gotten progressively worse since the first one and is pretty much the same thing with a new skin on it. The graphics don't feel 'next gen' at all. The gameplay is very arcadish. The single player portion is atrocious. It does shine in multi-player though but even at that, it's the same multi-player it's always been. I think it's been living on hype and hype alone since the first one.

Kill Zone 2 is pretty unique in terms of things that it does. It reminds you of Call of Duty but it's got a definitive flair to it. The graphics are unmatched. It's single player is clearly superior to Halo 3's. Multi-player is certainly debatable but it's totally different from Halo's MP and it's like comparing Apples to Oranges.



Rpruett said:
Why would Halo 3 be better than Kill Zone 2? I think I already played Halo 3? Wasn't that the one on the original Xbox?


In all seriousness, Halo is stale in my opinion. The game is fun no doubt but it's gotten progressively worse since the first one and is pretty much the same thing with a new skin on it. The graphics don't feel 'next gen' at all. The gameplay is very arcadish. The single player portion is atrocious. It does shine in multi-player though but even at that, it's the same multi-player it's always been. I think it's been living on hype and hype alone since the first one.

Kill Zone 2 is pretty unique in terms of things that it does. It reminds you of Call of Duty but it's got a definitive flair to it. The graphics are unmatched. It's single player is clearly superior to Halo 3's. Multi-player is certainly debatable but it's totally different from Halo's MP and it's like comparing Apples to Oranges.

I know right.  It was the most popular game on Live last year, two years after its release, because of hype alone.



KZ2 better graphics. Halo 3 better everything eles.



         

gamings_best said:
Squilliam said:
Netyaroze said:
Squilliam said:

They were both over-inflated due to hype anyway except Halo 3 never had as good graphics compared to the competition at the time whilst Killzone 2 got a lot of 10/10 graphics scores. So take away the graphics inflation and you have another Resistance Fall of Man 1/2 type game. A late 80s shooter along the same vein as Call of Duty 5. 

 

Hmm first I thought it was a mistake but probably I dont understand it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

85-89% Metacritic.

ok fanboy listen,

1. i did not know fps came out in the 80s,

2 your trying to say killzone was nothing but visuals and that's complete bullshit, the people who played and loved killzone loved the game, multiplayer was one of the best this generation, but only for hardcore gamers, halo was simple, easy, fun right out the box, and the funny thing is halo plays like the classic fps, while killzone is the more modern classs based gameplay, but I'm not saying halo was bad, it was a terrific game that nailed everything it wanted to be, it was super accessible as well, casual audience greatly outweigh the hardcore market

killzone on the other hand wasn't accessible, it was for hardcore gamers, it was a class, tactical shooter that required a lot of time and patience to master, this of course turned off alot of people as they were looking for something much to simple,

80's comment was extremely retarded though, the player hosted dedicated servers, and community intergration prove that much.

but these are 2 totally differnt game for 2 totally different gamers, only reason they are being put up against eachother is the fact that they are exclusive, and in that case I say it's not fair for either game, no one will just enjoy the game, instead just look for ways to bash the other game of the console they don't like, like you are doing, this truly is shaping up to be the worst gaming generation ever, you fanboys are dispicable.

 

I just love the hole "Hardcore" taunt. I and most people would play Fable 2 ( a "casual" RPG) over demon souls, you know why? Its not over complicating things, thats a hole new topic though.)

 

Isnt CoD series simular to KZ2? That means CoD is also modern class based gameplay, so that throws that out the window.

KZ2? tactical? No... Operation Flash point is Tactical.. KZ2 is just....CoD Sci Fi.. Also most people didnt like being a moving tank and the hole clip to drop somebody crap. 

 

 

 

 


 

I choose Halo...