I always felt that the difficulty was the only thing that separated them from the others in the genre. Like difficulty in place of originality.
I always felt that the difficulty was the only thing that separated them from the others in the genre. Like difficulty in place of originality.
Redgrave said: I always felt that the difficulty was the only thing that separated them from the others in the genre. Like difficulty in place of originality. |
I would love for you to recommend me some games like them then...
The narrative in Souls games is different than other games, they don't lack storyline at all, it's up to you to find it. But, if you don't like Souls II, I doubt you will like Bloodborne, so if I were you I will pass.
Yea, I played through it and know very little of the story.
If you like games with the stroy line as a focus, it might not be the game for you.
KLXVER said: You found the gameplay to be great, but the lack of story made you not like it? You must really hate Nintendo then... Anyway, if you want a straightforward story, then Bloodborne is probably not for you... I love it, but know fuck all of what its about |
Thank god for YT vids, too lazy to search out the intricate deatails of the story myself but its really interesting.
KLXVER said:
|
Lords of the attempting to cash in on Dark Souls popularity.
ktay95 said:
Lords of the attempting to cash in on Dark Souls popularity. |
Ive played it. I enjoyed it.
Dark Souls 2 (PS4) was my experiment to see if I should buy the hype for bloodborne... It passed for me with flying colors. If Bloodborne is better it might just kill me with entertainment.
I guess you should avoid Bloodborne then. Its story is even more obscure/obtuse.
Bet with Teeqoz for 2 weeks of avatar and sig control that Super Mario Odyssey would ship more than 7m on its first 2 months. The game shipped 9.07m, so I won
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.